AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Why did Sri Rama 🏹killed Vali from hide and not from front?

The short answer was that Sri Ram was focused on his work which included removing Vali, the brute beast like humanity out of the way. He was not keen to have his name counted as a moralist. In doing so he was fulfilling his work and mission to make Aryavarta free of all that would endanger the future of the average human kind evolving towards a sattwic state in course of time. He was also fulfilling his dharma as a friend to whom he had given his promise to help regain his throne.

The longish answer is that he let Sugriva fight Vali and waited until Vali committed the adharma of drawing the energy of the opponent (Sugriva) using his occult capacities. At that point the battle became unequal and he intervened when his friend called in distress after giving his best to defeat the wrong doer and yet failing.

He could have challenged Vali instead of shooting from behind the trees? A challenge between the two would be unequal either ways. None could defeat Vali in hand to hand combat as he had the magical capacity of sucking half the energy of the opponent. And if Rama challenged him to a fight with his bow then Vali would be no match. Shooting arrow from behind the trees was a way of implying that the two sides were yet matched in some way. On one side the impact of the arrow was softened greatly by shooting through the 7 trees. It was a match of strength though on unequal grounds.

Sri Rama himself explained to Vali why he did what he did. It was very simply to uphold the dharma. Vali had lived his life with adharma and to punish the evil doer was more important than anything else.

The spiritual answer of course is that the Divine acts according to another vision and to fulfill the work he has come to do which includes clearing the passage towards the future, paritranaya sadhunam vinashaya ca duskritam. He is not here to satisfy human notions of morality or conform to human ways of thinking and standards of conduct.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Is it just a coincidence that Sri Krishna was the de facto ruler of Dwarka and Sri Aurobindo started his work as the de facto ruler of Gujarat? I feel as if it indicates that he has started his work from where Sri Krishna left. 🦚🪷🍃🌄

There are quite a few other similarities. Sri Krishna was brought up in a foster home away from his parents and so was Sri Aurobindo. Sri Krishna came back and freed his people from the tyranny of Kansa and so did Sri Aurobindo return and gave himself to the work of freeing his motherland from the tyranny of the British. In the ….

Read More >

In Sri Aurobindo’s writings, he very much stresses the need for sexual discipline and Brahmacharya during the student phase of life, and I remember reading Schopenhauer on how the childlike curiosity, inquiry and energy get directed towards sexual mating with the coming of puberty.😯🦋✨💖[…]

Nature has created this world in a many-tiered way. The animal plan is its beginning, the animal humanity and the higher humanity are the middle, but the godlike humanity and the divinised superhumanity is its culmination…

Read More >

In Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy, the Divine consciousness manifests into the world through Involution, and human suffering is often described as a side effect of this evolutionary process. 🤔😣🥀🌄[…]

The first thing to understand is that the Divine who chose to plunge into the ignorance with the full knowledge of the aftermath of suffering and the eventual multiplication of delight, the manifold delight of multiplicity, did it with the full consent of our central being, that aspect of the soul that remains unfallen and hence always in the bliss of the eternal company of the Divine. The soul in us took it as a great adventure in which it plunged along …

Read More >