AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Sometimes we see how very common people around us progress in a very short span of time. That looks like a fairy tale. Why do such things happen😪? I know these are exceptions but still what could be the reasons for these?

How do we define common? We think that being born in poverty or a modest family with not much support or even not performing exceptionally in the school is being a common person. But the real criteria is within. A common man is he who is satisfied with the average ordinary life of comfort and material success. Most are indeed like that. But there are a few who nurture within them, often unknown to others, a flame of progress, an inbuilt faith in destiny and, dreams of a greater, happier life. Forces of the future respond to the persistent Idea and Faith within a person with which our destiny is shaped.

There are others who instinctively follow their inner lead, swadharma, rather than the pressure and demand from the Society and environment to perform and conform. They are ready to take the challenge and the risk. Even if they miss it prepares them for a future success.

Finally it is also a question of carry over from the past. Some lives are for preparation while some for reaping the fruits of past labour. Therefore one should always put in effort trusting destiny and God to give whatever and whenever He may choose to confer. 

There are ofcourse special destinies that apply to those chosen for a specific work in which case an incalculable force of Destiny or Grace acts in a way to fulfil the Divine Will in them regardless of any conditions. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Alok da, this might not exactly be a serious spiritual question with depth, but forgive me for asking this. One consistent pattern from childhood is that one sees is that in all the images and depictions that one gets acquainted of rishis, yogis that they really have massive long hair. 🧔🏻‍♀️🪷[…]

Hairs and Nails represent the inconscient atavistic elements in humans. They have an evolutionary necessity in animals but in human beings they are simply an extension of the animal body type. That is why there is in it a very strong genetic hereditary element. There were a number of very close disciples of Sri Aurobindo namely ..

Read More >

But doesn’t marriage keep people stable also – or would they drown themselves in alcohol and drugs, as in the West, due to loneliness? Free intimacy is also a hindrance, right? At least it fixes your emotional, physical, and financial needs. To explore higher areas of life… or wouldn’t everyone just live like animals? Osho’s ways were effective in giving an alternative to marriage? 🏡🌿

Marraige is like a double edged sword. If the partner is right it can help create stability. If the partner is not the right one it can lead to chronic unhappiness, conflicts and instability. This is especially true of our times when the real stabilising factor, the family, is broken.

Read More >

In the First Rik of the Rig Veda, Sri Aurobindo describes the nature of the Supreme as Sat-Chit-Ananda across different states of being. While explaining Nirguna and Saguna Sat, he uses phrases like “they nivṛtta, He nivṛtta” and “they pravṛtta, He nivṛtta”, which I find difficult to grasp. ☀️🕉️[…]

The Lord is both pravritti and nivratti, as the Fire and the Sun are both pravritti and nivratti. As Light they simply stand back and illumine the field but as energy they impel all things into dynamic movement. So too, the Divine as knowledge illumines all things with His Intelligence even without entering into them. But as power, Shakti, He

Read More >