AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Can you explain something about the Freudian theory as how it redundant  and completely against divine and life divine …and his suggestion that man is an animal😡 ..

Freudian psychoanalysis is one of the ways to understand human nature and apply this understanding to treat psychological problems. It is difficult to discuss all its aspects and ramifications but broadly speaking Freud postulated that human beings are primarily driven by the ‘pleasure principle’ or libido, which is the primal instinct. Later he modified this to accommodate the phenomenon of self harm etc to postulate another principle operative in life, the death wish or thanatos. He also postulated three parts of the mind, – Id which is the part with the most powerful primal,  animal instincts of food, sex, hunger, survival etc; the Ego which regulates these to give a modified expression according to the social needs and demands and finally, the superego which is the moralising mind. The third and aspect of his postulate is the existence of defence mechanisms that modify the basic instincts. 

Basically his whole field was limited to the animal instincts, the unconscious defence mechanisms of the ego modifying it and a civilisational superstructure such as religion etc which work towards repressing the subconscious animality in us. 

There are several defects in his theory. For example he does not take into account man’s higher strivings and aspiration, the presence of higher elements such as renunciation, sacrifice, nobility, courage and the experience of divinity in man lumping and dumping them together as merely a social construct. In other words he inverts the evolutionary process by looking at the higher as a shadow of the lower, love as a modification of lust, for example. It is a bottom up view of creation looking at the inconscient principle as the driving force..The spiritual understanding is far more complete with a top down view. It looks at lust as a degradation of love. Man suffers not only due to the suppression of the subconscient parts as Freud suggested but much more due to the suppression of the higher spiritual elements as spiritual psychology suggests.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Are the processes of Purification and Transformation the same thing? I have a little confusion. In the process of Purification, we face some adverse forces that are mentioned by Sri Aurobindo in the chapter ‘The difficulties of Transformation’. Are they the same? 🔥🌄[…]

Purification is the indispensable basis for liberation. It means removing the covering and coating of ignorance and falsehood that veils the true self. In the yoga seeking for mukti, the purification has to be less thorough. It is enough to bring some sattwic rectitude in nature, satwasanshuddhi. Transformation proper..

Read More >

Can we understand Sri Aurobindo and His yoga with the physical mind, as you say physical mind never grasps the Truth in its highest sense. So if we feel good by reading Sri Aurobindo or The Mother, even that is from the physical plane, wanting a good, perfect physical life. 😅❤️‍🔥🦋 […]

Yes, it is difficult for the physical mind to shift its fixed position and comfort zones..It feels lost and insecure. But once it accepts the New Idea then it gets firmly established there. It is somewhat like…

Read More >

The talk sounded like you were putting down Marriage as a concept! True, some regions do this horse ride/wasting money, which is in bad taste. However, Marriage as a concept gives the monkey minds a framework. 🥸💍💒[…]

Yes, I agree that for the average human being, these outer frameworks and social institutions do serve a purpose of holding people together. Of course, as I mentioned, marriage or not, love and togetherness can be beautiful and ought to be so. But for that, man needs to evolve beyond the present frameworks, which operate as long as one accepts the limits of dos and don’ts. …

Read More >