AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

How could a sensible woman like Draupadi say this, “Andhe Ka beta Andha”? People blame her for the war but I think the war was inevitable and that it was the Mother who veiled herself in her as is mentioned in Savitri, Can you please explain this🤔…

This is one of the classic examples of how false narratives are built. This incidence often quoted to justify the War, though a ridiculous and absurd justification even if it were true, to disrobe, cheat, rob you of the kingdom just because your sister in law passed a snide remark, never really happened. The Vyas Mahabharata mentions that when Duryodhana visits Indraprasth he falls while mistaking a solid surface for waters. The four Pandava brothers laugh (they say nothing) but Yudhishthira remains silent. Draupadi is nowhere even in the scene. So much for the facts.

This narrative came up following a similar dialogue in Dharmveer Bharati’s fiction, Andhayug. Later it was further popularized by BR Chopra in the teleserial and people started believing it to be true. 

The war was clearly and squarely due to Dhritrashtra’s blind attachment to his children, Duryodhana’s extreme ambition and jealousy, Karna’s misplaced sense of virtue, Bheesma’s attachment to his vow placing it above dharma, and Dronacharya’s hankering after wealth, status and power.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I was just reading Karl marx’s Short essay on the power of money, he wonders about this bewildering engimatic force which shapes our life and history and he quotes many of Sri Aurobindo’s favourite poets like Shakespeare and Goethe on how this mysterious force turns things upside down, Sri Aurobindo in Savitri covers everything about the cosmos even if it’s just a few lines but there’s isn’t anything about money if I am not wrong. Why is this so? Why is such a gigantic subject ignored🤔?

First of all there are a few presumptions there. Though Sri Aurobindo has appreciated Shakespeare and Goethe his appreciation of them is part of a general appreciation of all that is good in mankind. He has, for..

Read More >

I had a question on a particular phrase in Savitri. “The universe is an endless masquerade: For nothing here is utterly what it seems; It is a dream-fact vision of a truth Which but for the dream would not be wholly true, A phenomenon stands out significant Against dim backgrounds of eternity; “What exactly is a “dream-fact vision of a truth”? Either we have dreams, or we have facts, two different order of realities🤔.

To think of the language of Savitri, it feels like Sri Aurobindo has stretched the bounds of the finite to the utmost, by capturing the

Read More >