AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

What is the difference in integral yoga and vaishnav bhakti yoga. In vaishna yoga surrender is the mean for sadhana and many great vaishnav saints have achieved the highest realization. In vaishnav literature we found the psychic transformation which express through many bhakti sangit, bhajan etc. If the psychic transformation can prepared us another two transformation so why the great bhakti yogis are not speak about supramental? Really I don’t know what is supramental and why it is necessary for mankind? If through bhakti the psychic transformation is happening then is it right to those great bhakts have realised that state they have also go through this purification of nature and they have fought in nature level, if it is true then why Sri Aurobindo says this is new yoga? I can’t understand it. Dada Can you clarify my doubt🙄.

Vaishnava bhakti, in fact any true bhakti as we see in certain forms of Christian Yoga, Sufism, Shakta bhakti can all lead to psychic realisation, if not always the transformation. In some it may also open the doors to highest realization of the Divine leading eventually either to personal liberation or to a constant dwelling with the Divine. All these are no doubt great achievements and Sri Aurobindo does acknowledge these, and several other, various ways mankind has taken to discover the Divine and find the true freedom. 

The question is if this is all that is needed. Bhakti fulfils the demand of the heart for the Bliss and beatitude of the Divine that comes through love devotion. But what about the mind’s seeking for an integral Truth, including Self Knowledge, God Knowledge and World Knowledge. What about the parts of life that seek power and mastery over the world forces, to conquer them for the Divine and to serve Him in every way and every activity and through everything. What about the body’s need to be free from disease, degeneration and death. What about the aspiration for Perfection within as well as in the society and the world towards which great Souls and Avatars such as Rama and Krishna laboured and suffered. We can’t invalidate these legitimate aspirations of mankind because we have found our freedom in God. If bhakti is all then it was wrong of Sri Krishna to push Arjuna into the War of Kurukshetra or for Rama to lead an army of Vanaras to rescue Janaki. Aren’t we missing something when we sing and dance in the name of Sri Krishna and call it Vaishnava bhakti while refuse to see His form terrible and divine on the battlefield of Kurukshetra or fail to acknowledge gyana and karma as indispensable elements of His bhakti even though He himself reveals it in the Gita. If we consider these we will easily see that Vaishnava bhakti has caught only a small fragmentary glimpse of the Divine in His total Splendour.  

Experiences and realisations do not automatically lead to transformation.  They take place in a portion of our being. But our nature has many sides and aspects and dimensions. These may remain unchanged by the inner realisation. It is like we may be one person while meditating alone or doing sankirtan but quite another when dealing with a complex mathematical problem or a terrible neighbour.  Generally confronted with such challenges the bhakta prays and surrenders to his ishta and is no doubt helped and protected. But he never masters the part that wants to escape from the problem.  Hence himself and the world remain unchanged. But there are souls, heroic souls that do not seek individual Mukti but aspire for the transformation of the human race. All this is not possible through individual moksha through bhakti alone.

Supramental transformation means that the human consciousness has become one with the Creator, not only in the soul but in all the aspects of our nature.  It means to see, understand and act in the world as God sees, knows and acts in the world.  It means to realise God not only within,  withdrawing from the world but also on the surface while awake and active in the world.  It means that not only an individual or few or even many human beings realise God but the emergence of a new species beyond Man, the supramental race for which the experience of God will be normal and natural, an effortless constant identification, as spontaneous as our breathing and heartbeat.  

It is surely not an easy change, an entire change of the human consciousness, nature and present instruments into a new divine being who thinks, feels, loves, wills, perceives, acts divinely. It means to be filled and possessed by God, not only in the heart and feelings but brain and thoughts, in the very cells of the body.  

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Hindus worship various gods and goddesses. Like Ganesha for success. Lakshmi for wealth. Durga for protection. Similarly, why is Shivalinga worshipped? As you mentioned yesterday, Shivalinga is a very powerful symbol of divine power working on earth. It is representative of the union of Shiva and Nature. So is Shivalinga worshiped to seek prosperity, nourishment, strength from Prakriti that is Parvati and wisdom, knowledge from Shiva🤔?

As to what one can ask is upto the one who is worshipping. As Sri Krishna says in the Gita that whatever god one worships and whatever boon one asks it ultimately reaches the Supreme Divine,…

Read More >

I was ruminating on an issue and wanted your opinion. Sri Aurobindo said that Sri Ramakrishna was as much an Avatar as Christ, so his spiritual power or impact on world in numbers or quality must be similar if not equivalent to that of Christ. Sri Ramakrishna also reveals that Maa Sarada devi was the Avatar of Mahasaraswati, so she too must be equivalent in power and impact on the world to Sri Ramakrishna and therefore Christ. And Swami Vivekananda was a Rudra vibhuti who did Tapasya and realized the truth within, so his spiritual power and impact must be greater than Muhammad or even Shivaji or Augustus. And I don’t even need to mention Sri Aurobindo and the Mother themselves as the Supreme Avatars. And there were countless enlightened sages unleashed into India in the last century like the Heavens had broke loose😐.

First about the facts. Sri Aurobindo did not speak of Sri Ramkrishna as an Avatar in the sense of the Gita. In fact Sri Ramakrishna himself spoke something similar when he spoke about it. But both Sri Aurobindo and Sri ….

Read More >