AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

(1) What is the limit to tolerance, titiksha, when it comes to adjusting with others? Some seem to take advantage of one’s tolerance and kindness. When do we know that tolerance has reached its limit? Understanding the idea of tolerance rightly is of a great help both in practical and spiritual life. (2) Does a realised being have any limits for tolerance or do they suffer😒 and endure limitlessly for the greater good of the world?

(1) Titiksha is about the ability to bear the outer shocks of life. It increases the power of forebearance, to bear things, to endure, sahanshakti. Its principle is not to be driven by the physical and vital forces that draw our responses and reaction. By this practice the knot of the vital ego gets loosened and the strings of consciousness gets detached from outer situations to facilitate going within.  It is a passive practice that helps immensely in spiritual progress.

Tolerance on the other hand is a virtue that is often professed, seldom practiced and when practiced, ends up flattering the sattwic ego of righteousness. It is an action, an inner movement. There is hardly any spiritual merit in it. Yet it can be used as a springboard to develop equality.  

However whether through forebearance and patient endurance or through tolerance,  equality has a dynamic side. It means no more to react under the stress of the ego and its ignorant reactions but to act according to the Truth of things, Dharma,  to take a transpersonal or suprapersonal standpoint,  to act with the sole idea of helping the truth to manifest within us and in the world and in the people involved. Passive equality helps us to step back from surface reactions and have the right perception and right understanding of people and things.  Dynamic equality helps us to give the right response without being clouded by personal emotions and reactions. 

(2) There are no limits to tolerance because a realised being is not hurt being free from egoism. But by then his tolerance has changed into peace, wideness and compassion that looks behind appearances and sees the soul rather than the surface personality. But a realised person may act with great force and powerfully and even destroy the perpetrators of evil and wrong doers but without any hatred, inner disturbance nor carry any inner reactions as backlash. And if the person changes the attitude then the realised person does not carry it forward and is quick to forgive and embrace with love the next moment letting go of the past response. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Why some people suffer so much in their lives both physically and mentally while others get everything smooth both mentally and physically? Yesterday I went to meet my 82 year old neighbour who is suffering from cancer for the past four years. Her treatment is going on and she was fine till June 2024 but now she has become very weak and suffering from multiple myeloma. One can see pain and suffering in her eyes. After meeting her I felt it is better to die than to live in this condition😭. Is this suffering due to what we call prarabdh or is it something else? And why not death comes and take lives of such persons who are suffering a lot because it is very painful to live in such condition?

That earthly life has its burden of suffering is obvious. The difference exists in theories about the cause of suffering. The wise say its root cause is ignorance. What is meant by this term is that we do not know who we are or why we are here? We do not know the play of forces and the way to master them? Let us apply …

Read More >

Why was this world 🌏 made? You explained it beautifully, but I’m an atheist and don’t believe it was created by a power. If I did, I wouldn’t be asking this question.

Normally one would this question only if one believed that there is a Conscious Being or Power that has gone into the making of this world. If one is an Atheist then the right question would be not why but how this world was made. Because non-belief in a Conscious Wisdom and Force that has gone into…

Read More >

What were the events that turned the following wars? Ramayana, Mahabharata, World War 1 💣and World War 2. I believe the World War 2’s turning point was Dunkirk or was it when Winston Churchill became Prime Minister or I might be wrong? Please explain.

All these three or four major wars took place during the time of the three Avatars who had come to establish dharma consistent with the dawn of a new age. Therefore these wars can very well be seen as the last ditch attempt for the forces of adharma to resist the new age being ushered by the Avatar. Therefore each war has a spiritual as well as physical turning point.

The spiritual turning point is when the forces of adharma took an extreme step that invited a strong recoil as well as a Divine Intervention. Such a point for the Ramayana war that

Read More >