AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

I have too many confusions in understanding the great god – Shiva.(1) He is both fierce as Rudra πŸ”₯& Bhairava and benevolent as Shiva & Mahadeva.

(2) This world is said to be the dance of Shiva – Natraja but at the same time he is described as a destroyer (Brahma as creator & Vishnu as preserver) in puranas.

(3) He is the only great god who has a complete family like we humans but is depicted in not so groomed & domesticated look and considered as the granter of Moksha.

(4) Unlike other great gods, his abode is on earth – Kailasha and Kashi.

(5) His consort Parvati also has two contrasting aspects – Nurturing Gauri & Fierce Kali.

(6) What do our scriptures are trying to signify through these contradictions?

(7) Does his living on Kailasha means he and his family are the closest gods to call for.

Help me out in clearing each of them.

Shiva’s story is of synthesis rather than of contradictions. It is our human misreading that has erected the gulf between the spiritual and the material, between this worldly and other worldly, between family life and ascetic life, between creation and destruction. Shiva represents the Force aspect of Sacchidananda. It is one and the same Force that operates everywhere and in everything. This is the same thing that Sri Krishna teaches, the difference being that the path of Shiva is of tapasya and the death of the ego identified with the physical body. Hence it starts from the shamashan bhabhuti, the ashes of the pure. Sri Krishna is the path of surrender where the ego is annihilated by a complete self giving to the Divine. So it goes through all the activities of the world. But the end result is the same. Annihilate the ego and desire-self and then it doesn’t matter whether you are in this world or another, whether you are a householder or an ascetic.Β 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Are the processes of Purification and Transformation the same thing? I have a little confusion. In the process of Purification, we face some adverse forces that are mentioned by Sri Aurobindo in the chapter ‘The difficulties of Transformation’. Are they the same? πŸ”₯πŸŒ„[…]

Purification is the indispensable basis for liberation. It means removing the covering and coating of ignorance and falsehood that veils the true self. In the yoga seeking for mukti, the purification has to be less thorough. It is enough to bring some sattwic rectitude in nature, satwasanshuddhi. Transformation proper..

Read More >

Can we understand Sri Aurobindo and His yoga with the physical mind, as you say physical mind never grasps the Truth in its highest sense.Β So if we feel good by reading Sri Aurobindo or The Mother, even that is from the physical plane, wanting a good, perfect physical life. πŸ˜…β€οΈβ€πŸ”₯πŸ¦‹Β […]

Yes, it is difficult for the physical mind to shift its fixed position and comfort zones..It feels lost and insecure. But once it accepts the New Idea then it gets firmly established there. It is somewhat like…

Read More >

The talk sounded like you were putting down Marriage as a concept! True, some regions do this horse ride/wasting money, which is in bad taste. However, Marriage as a concept gives the monkey minds a framework. πŸ₯ΈπŸ’πŸ’’[…]

Yes, I agree that for the average human being, these outer frameworks and social institutions do serve a purpose of holding people together. Of course, as I mentioned, marriage or not, love and togetherness can be beautiful and ought to be so. But for that, man needs to evolve beyond the present frameworks, which operate as long as one accepts the limits of dos and don’ts. …

Read More >