AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

Does the Jivatma surrenders to the Divine or it is the Psychic that surrenders to the Divine. What is the difference in approach of shadana from the point of view of these 2 beings? Are both of them required for attaining the goal of Supramental transformation in Integral yoga🤔?

The psychic being entering the fields of ignorance and the central being that remains above the play of lower nature (Prakriti) are both two inseparable aspects of the one Jivatma, like the two identical birds, dwasuparna of the Mundaka Upanishad.  The Jivatma (whether as the central being or the psychic being) are always surrendered to the Divine. For the Integral yoga one has to discover the psychic being which is the key to all the rest.

The Immanent individual, Cosmic and the Transcendent Divine are three poises of the One Divine.  Their unity is discovered in the Supramental. But otherwise one realises either one or the other as if they are different and exclusive to each other leading to conflicting experiences and thereby mutually exclusive religions. Sri Krishna’s Viswaroopa is a summary glimpse of this triple experience. 

The Supreme is everywhere and in everything and can be realised anywhere and on any plane. However the experience of the Supreme by leaping from planes below the Overmind leaves a big gap between the Self and the World.  The secret can be resolved and integrated only in the Supramental. 

There is no absolute bar to surrender without realizing the separation between the Purusha and Prakriti.  Bhakta does not care about the separation but at some point he ends up realizing it by the Divine Grace. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Dearest Alok da, From lines of Savitri: High seers, moved poets saw the eternal thoughts That, travellers from on high, arrive to us Deformed by our search, tricked by costuming mind,…

It is the actual experience of a god each time he or she takes a human birth. The consciousness of a true, great god is high and vast and pure. But the human consciousness and the human instruments of speech and action, let alone the world conditions do not support this vastness that …

Read More >

My niece who is 12 yrs old doesn’t like sharing😥. If she takes her favorite food to school and her friends ask her to share, she doesn’t give or gives a very small piece. If by chance she happens to share a chocolate with girls she doesn’t like, she wants to snatch it away. She is attached to Krishna, and only thing that pacifies her is when we tell her that Krishna likes if she shares what He has given her. She says “I know it’s bad, i know it’s a devil that says this, but I can’t overpower it. It tells me that those girls did bad and said bad things about you, instead of that you shared your things, now you go steal something from them. Or I keep thinking what will I get if I give them”..[conti]

Single child may not be the reason. Rather it is quite unlikely. Children often pick up number of behaviours that they unconsciously notice in significant elders around …

Read More >