AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

I wanted to ask is about your statement that wanting to marry someone is considered lust. I don’t fully understand that concept—if you love someone and want to be with them, how does that equate to lust🫤?

I don’t mean to say that marriage is an expression of lust. It is an institution meant to regulate unbridled sexual activity and to ensure that human energies are engaged in bringing up children and transmitting values through family. It is a social institution meant to stabilise the family unit, to ensure genetic continuity, to regulate the sexual impulse and thereby to maintain a fixed social order. This is the ordinary purpose of marriage. But a man and woman relationship can go beyond this limited frame into a true companionship. This however is rare and does not require the formal institution of marriage, sexual engagement and children etc to fulfil a deeper and higher purpose than marriage ordinarily provides.

Also we need to distinguish between love, lust and sex. Sex is the act, a biological mechanism evolved by nature for propagation of a species. It is associated with intense momentary pleasure through a network of nerves to ensure that the purpose of Nature is fulfilled. In human beings since every animal activity is humanised it gets naturally associated with the heart’s tender feelings of love. But in its origin love is very different from what we ordinarily experience. The true movement of love is to give itself and through this act of giving become one with the loved. When this urge to unite enters the physical body, it is compelled to use the means provided by nature. However the physical expression of love need not be sexual but something much more beautiful. It is simply a habitual association of love with sex that combines the two as if synonymous. Lust is however different. It is a rising up of intense passions and desire to possess, appropriate and the craving will to make one’s own what is not really given to us by destiny. It is wanting someone or something which is not yours.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Dearest Alok da, From lines of Savitri: High seers, moved poets saw the eternal thoughts That, travellers from on high, arrive to us Deformed by our search, tricked by costuming mind,…

It is the actual experience of a god each time he or she takes a human birth. The consciousness of a true, great god is high and vast and pure. But the human consciousness and the human instruments of speech and action, let alone the world conditions do not support this vastness that …

Read More >

My niece who is 12 yrs old doesn’t like sharing😥. If she takes her favorite food to school and her friends ask her to share, she doesn’t give or gives a very small piece. If by chance she happens to share a chocolate with girls she doesn’t like, she wants to snatch it away. She is attached to Krishna, and only thing that pacifies her is when we tell her that Krishna likes if she shares what He has given her. She says “I know it’s bad, i know it’s a devil that says this, but I can’t overpower it. It tells me that those girls did bad and said bad things about you, instead of that you shared your things, now you go steal something from them. Or I keep thinking what will I get if I give them”..[conti]

Single child may not be the reason. Rather it is quite unlikely. Children often pick up number of behaviours that they unconsciously notice in significant elders around …

Read More >