AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

Is sex an essential part of a relationship? What happens when one partner feels a natural desire for physical intimacy, while the other is either not interested or doesn’t feel the same way? How should someone navigate this difference without compromising the emotional bond they share? Is it possible to maintain a fulfilling relationship when such a fundamental aspect of connection is missing or mismatchedđŸ€”?

Sex has little if anything to do with love. What love needs for its integral fulfilment is physical intimacy but that need not mean sex. There are beautiful ways of expressing physical intimacy such as touch, embrace, kiss, holding hands. However there are two problems with this ideal bond. First is that the sex impulse is too strong in living beings and its roots are deep in our biology. The nervous system is so wired that even a passing touch can trigger a cascade of sexual arousal which is why too much free mixing between girls and boys, especially alone carries an inherent risk that the emotions can at any point of time spill over into passion. Due to its original purpose of procreation, women who have to bear the child get triggered by the mind and the heart whereas men get aroused by physical sight, sound, touch etc. Of course now, for various reasons, there is a change but generally the trigger points and arousal mechanisms are different in the two genders often leading to a mismatch of responses. In fact the true feminine type is less interested in the animal aspect though she often concedes to a man’s demands.

That apart, the more refined the consciousness is, the less it tends towards the animal ways. But the problem is the way the nervous system and the hormones operate. The way to navigate through a relationship where there is less need of sex in one partner and a strong sexual impulse in the other is threefold.

Talk to each other and teach the partner about what physical intimacy without sex would mean. Most men do not understand it. 

Concede from time to time as a part of love that gives oneself in every way to the one whom we love.

Set the person free to follow his nature and graze in different grounds like an animal until he gets sick and tired of this too brief and too temporary a pleasure. Love can then have its chance. 

Yes it is very much possible to have deep strong bonds of beautiful love without any physical involvement or with a minimum of it. These bonds, often fed by the psychic flame, can last long, endure through life and be a source of great perpetual joy in a couple. But for this both have to be on the same page which is very rare, especially for men.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this


Related Posts

Hindus worship various gods and goddesses. Like Ganesha for success. Lakshmi for wealth. Durga for protection. Similarly, why is Shivalinga worshipped? As you mentioned yesterday, Shivalinga is a very powerful symbol of divine power working on earth. It is representative of the union of Shiva and Nature. So is Shivalinga worshiped to seek prosperity, nourishment, strength from Prakriti that is Parvati and wisdom, knowledge from ShivađŸ€”?

As to what one can ask is upto the one who is worshipping. As Sri Krishna says in the Gita that whatever god one worships and whatever boon one asks it ultimately reaches the Supreme Divine,…

Read More >

I was ruminating on an issue and wanted your opinion. Sri Aurobindo said that Sri Ramakrishna was as much an Avatar as Christ, so his spiritual power or impact on world in numbers or quality must be similar if not equivalent to that of Christ. Sri Ramakrishna also reveals that Maa Sarada devi was the Avatar of Mahasaraswati, so she too must be equivalent in power and impact on the world to Sri Ramakrishna and therefore Christ. And Swami Vivekananda was a Rudra vibhuti who did Tapasya and realized the truth within, so his spiritual power and impact must be greater than Muhammad or even Shivaji or Augustus. And I don’t even need to mention Sri Aurobindo and the Mother themselves as the Supreme Avatars. And there were countless enlightened sages unleashed into India in the last century like the Heavens had broke loose😐.

First about the facts. Sri Aurobindo did not speak of Sri Ramkrishna as an Avatar in the sense of the Gita. In fact Sri Ramakrishna himself spoke something similar when he spoke about it. But both Sri Aurobindo and Sri ….

Read More >