AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

I’ve met quite many people who seem to be interesting, provoke my mental curiosity, vital attraction, but I rarely get to meet someone who has a similar spiritual aspiration. And in such cases, there may be very little vital or physical attraction at all. Is it a mistake to get involved with someone who doesn’t share your spiritual path, even if there is an affinity at all the other levels? Also, what if the other person does have a path, but they are a buddhist, for example? Would that create a contradiction of spiritual currents🫤?

There are no such fixed rules in spiritual life which moves in a wide free space. Each journey is unique and different. What helps one may hinder another. So keep to the one main rule, to stay focused on and never to forget the goal if one has found it. The obstacles to progress are always within us, especially in our attitudes. Outer circumstances hardly matter. Those who want to progress turn every outer circumstance into a means of progress while others do not move much despite, what may be considered, outwardly very favourable circumstance.

As to relationship, its core is love and the sign of love is joy of togetherness and the urge to give. Two people walking on different paths may bring wideness whereas two people on the same path may quarrel with each other over petty things. Most important is harmony. Of course if the partner is very demanding or with low tendencies then it can create a great strain to live with such a person. But if there is a basic understanding, care, respect then it is a good start. The rest is a question of destiny and unfolding in real time.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I was just reading Karl marx’s Short essay on the power of money, he wonders about this bewildering engimatic force which shapes our life and history and he quotes many of Sri Aurobindo’s favourite poets like Shakespeare and Goethe on how this mysterious force turns things upside down, Sri Aurobindo in Savitri covers everything about the cosmos even if it’s just a few lines but there’s isn’t anything about money if I am not wrong. Why is this so? Why is such a gigantic subject ignored🤔?

First of all there are a few presumptions there. Though Sri Aurobindo has appreciated Shakespeare and Goethe his appreciation of them is part of a general appreciation of all that is good in mankind. He has, for..

Read More >

I had a question on a particular phrase in Savitri. “The universe is an endless masquerade: For nothing here is utterly what it seems; It is a dream-fact vision of a truth Which but for the dream would not be wholly true, A phenomenon stands out significant Against dim backgrounds of eternity; “What exactly is a “dream-fact vision of a truth”? Either we have dreams, or we have facts, two different order of realities🤔.

To think of the language of Savitri, it feels like Sri Aurobindo has stretched the bounds of the finite to the utmost, by capturing the

Read More >