AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

Krishna agreeing not to fight in the battle? Why so? He was God himself so why he agreed not to lift any weapon 🙄?

The Mahabharata war was primarily a war between the two Kuru families. Since Sri Krishna was related to both the Kauravas and the Pandavas. Sri Krishna’s father Vasudeva was brother of Kunti making Sri Krishna a first cousin to the Pandavas. On the other hand Sri Krishna’s son Samba (born through Jambvati daughter of Jambvan) was married to Duryodhana’s daughter Lakshmana making the two closely related to each other.  His active participation on either side would have created further family rift. But chieftains from his army stood rank on both sides, especially Satyaki and Kritvarma. 

Secondly he had in a way foreseen or rather forewilled the result of the war in which the main instrument was Arjuna, chosen as the man of destiny. It was important that the Pandava brothers especially Arjuna is kept safe from the devious designs of the Kauravas. Driving the chariot of Arjuna ensured that they were always together thereby ensuring the victory. His spiritual force constantly accompanying the main hero Arjuna was a much better way to ensure victory especially given the role of charioteer in the battle (see how Salya as charioteer helped in Karna’s defeat) than if they were split and fighting independently. 

Finally as we all know that wars are first won in the mind and then on the battlefield. Planning and strategy are the most important elements in the war and Sri Krishna kept this role to himself.  

Of course I am not bringing in the spiritual dimension wherein Sri Krishna and Arjuna had fought together the battle of the Ages as Nar Narayan. Their coming together was the occult condition of victory against the forces of darkness embodied by the Dhritrastrians. This occult truth of the Divine Force and the human instrument ensuring victory is declared to be one of the profound secrets of all battles, ‘yatra yogeshwar Krishna, yatra partho dhanurdhara, tatra srivijayo…..’. Sri Krishna, during the war was in a Superconscient state as the yogeshwar and not a warrior. This was needed to ensure the victory as indeed it did.

Krishna fighting the war would have risked the life of Arjuna whereas Sri Krishna playing the charioteer of dear Arjuna would ensure his safety (as is evidenced by a number of events such as Jaidratha vadh, saving him from Takshaka Astra of Karna, ensuring death of karna, restraining him from leaping at Dhristdyumna to save Dronachaya, saving him from Bheesma’s wrath etc) and with Arjuna alive and Krishna by his side, the victory was inevitable. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Dearest Alok da, From lines of Savitri: High seers, moved poets saw the eternal thoughts That, travellers from on high, arrive to us Deformed by our search, tricked by costuming mind,…

It is the actual experience of a god each time he or she takes a human birth. The consciousness of a true, great god is high and vast and pure. But the human consciousness and the human instruments of speech and action, let alone the world conditions do not support this vastness that …

Read More >

My niece who is 12 yrs old doesn’t like sharing😥. If she takes her favorite food to school and her friends ask her to share, she doesn’t give or gives a very small piece. If by chance she happens to share a chocolate with girls she doesn’t like, she wants to snatch it away. She is attached to Krishna, and only thing that pacifies her is when we tell her that Krishna likes if she shares what He has given her. She says “I know it’s bad, i know it’s a devil that says this, but I can’t overpower it. It tells me that those girls did bad and said bad things about you, instead of that you shared your things, now you go steal something from them. Or I keep thinking what will I get if I give them”..[conti]

Single child may not be the reason. Rather it is quite unlikely. Children often pick up number of behaviours that they unconsciously notice in significant elders around …

Read More >