AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

They call Rama 🏹 an ideal man but I think he must have been ideal thousands of years back, how can he be ideal and relatable today?

It’s a mistake to think that Rama is not relatable today as even today he is an example of a perfect man. Rama lays the foundation of individual ethics and public morality on the edifice of Dharma. He shows by example what it means to be an ideal son, ideal brother, ideal friend, ideal husband and an ideal king, in short, the epitome of an ideal Man. Calm and courageous, Rama combines within him unparalleled valour and strength with tender love and care which itself makes his personality so lovable. An obedient son who carries no bitterness against his irresponsible father and a scheming step mother, a brother who would easily renounce his rightful kingdom for his younger brother and give his life to protect them, a friend who embraces all kinds, the poor, the downtrodden, the outcast, those of lowly birth or much inferior to him in wisdom and intelligence. Caring even for the least animal and flower and tree, he is ready to fight their whom he has accepted as friends, embracing all, abandoning none, quick to forgive even his arch rival and enemy if he shows genuine repentance, Rama is indeed the ideal friend who would never break a promise, once given. As a husband, he comes out as a tenderly caring person who would want to fulfil her wishes and accept her counsel, protect her against the Rakshasa menace and when abducted by deceit and cunning, takes upon himself to defend her against the most formidable of opponents, Ravana. He is the one (and perhaps the only) example of unflinching loyalty not only towards friends but towards his wife. Rejecting all advances made towards him to win his affection by the beautiful Asuri princess Sooparnkha, Rama is the standing example of what it means to be faithful to one’s wife. He marches with an army of monkeys to rescue his wife against all odds.

Even though his Rajdharma compels him to abandon Sita to keep intact his people together as well as to set an unprecedented example of public probity where a king is subject to the same laws that a commoner is. For such was the law at that time, a law no doubt harsh and even cruel by our modern standards, yet a law meant to curb the excess of  animal and rakshasic elements that still governed the human. Rama had come to humanise this subhuman layer of humanity but first he must himself come under the law to restore confidence in the people before changing it.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

When I was dropping her off at school, she asked me: Mummy, hum knife se body ko katte hain to Aatma kyu nahi marti… I replied: Kyuki Gita me likha hain ki Aatma ajar hain, amar hain. Then she asked me: Aesa kya hain jo wo nahi mar sakti. She is not satisfied with my answer da. 👧🏼👩🏻‍👧🏻🪷🌻

Beautiful question. You can give her some examples of material things that cannot be killed or destroyed by knife, for example water, air, fire, space. Energy also cannot be destroyed. So too thoughts and feelings and will cannot be destroyed by any external force. This way she will understand that there are many things even within the…

Read More >

My brother recently had a daughter. This made me read and explore more about that subject. I understand that the soul chooses to take human birth to progress further, but does it also choose the family or parents through whom to come into this human vital world? 👧🏼🪷🌻✨

Choosing the parents happens when the psychic being is developed and able to chose the conditions of earthly life into details. Until then it is only a general choice about the conditions and not particular details. Until a certain degree of development is completed the psychic being only goes by a …

Read More >

Sri Aurobindo writes in “The web of yoga”, “We can pass into the Paratpara Brahman, but we can’t know the Paratpara Brahman.” Does it mean attaining Nirvanam, The Total Merger, that nothing individual is left? So knowing is not possible in Nirvanam. Am I right in my understanding? 💫💖🪷✨

Yes because knowing implies a competition between the knower and the known. We can therefore become Brahman not know IT as know an object. We can lose ourselves into …

Read More >