AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

They call Rama 🏹 an ideal man but I think he must have been ideal thousands of years back, how can he be ideal and relatable today?

It’s a mistake to think that Rama is not relatable today as even today he is an example of a perfect man. Rama lays the foundation of individual ethics and public morality on the edifice of Dharma. He shows by example what it means to be an ideal son, ideal brother, ideal friend, ideal husband and an ideal king, in short, the epitome of an ideal Man. Calm and courageous, Rama combines within him unparalleled valour and strength with tender love and care which itself makes his personality so lovable. An obedient son who carries no bitterness against his irresponsible father and a scheming step mother, a brother who would easily renounce his rightful kingdom for his younger brother and give his life to protect them, a friend who embraces all kinds, the poor, the downtrodden, the outcast, those of lowly birth or much inferior to him in wisdom and intelligence. Caring even for the least animal and flower and tree, he is ready to fight their whom he has accepted as friends, embracing all, abandoning none, quick to forgive even his arch rival and enemy if he shows genuine repentance, Rama is indeed the ideal friend who would never break a promise, once given. As a husband, he comes out as a tenderly caring person who would want to fulfil her wishes and accept her counsel, protect her against the Rakshasa menace and when abducted by deceit and cunning, takes upon himself to defend her against the most formidable of opponents, Ravana. He is the one (and perhaps the only) example of unflinching loyalty not only towards friends but towards his wife. Rejecting all advances made towards him to win his affection by the beautiful Asuri princess Sooparnkha, Rama is the standing example of what it means to be faithful to one’s wife. He marches with an army of monkeys to rescue his wife against all odds.

Even though his Rajdharma compels him to abandon Sita to keep intact his people together as well as to set an unprecedented example of public probity where a king is subject to the same laws that a commoner is. For such was the law at that time, a law no doubt harsh and even cruel by our modern standards, yet a law meant to curb the excess of  animal and rakshasic elements that still governed the human. Rama had come to humanise this subhuman layer of humanity but first he must himself come under the law to restore confidence in the people before changing it.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Dearest Alok da, From lines of Savitri: High seers, moved poets saw the eternal thoughts That, travellers from on high, arrive to us Deformed by our search, tricked by costuming mind,…

It is the actual experience of a god each time he or she takes a human birth. The consciousness of a true, great god is high and vast and pure. But the human consciousness and the human instruments of speech and action, let alone the world conditions do not support this vastness that …

Read More >

My niece who is 12 yrs old doesn’t like sharing😥. If she takes her favorite food to school and her friends ask her to share, she doesn’t give or gives a very small piece. If by chance she happens to share a chocolate with girls she doesn’t like, she wants to snatch it away. She is attached to Krishna, and only thing that pacifies her is when we tell her that Krishna likes if she shares what He has given her. She says “I know it’s bad, i know it’s a devil that says this, but I can’t overpower it. It tells me that those girls did bad and said bad things about you, instead of that you shared your things, now you go steal something from them. Or I keep thinking what will I get if I give them”..[conti]

Single child may not be the reason. Rather it is quite unlikely. Children often pick up number of behaviours that they unconsciously notice in significant elders around …

Read More >