AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Why did Sri Rama 🏹killed Vali from hide and not from front?

The short answer was that Sri Ram was focused on his work which included removing Vali, the brute beast like humanity out of the way. He was not keen to have his name counted as a moralist. In doing so he was fulfilling his work and mission to make Aryavarta free of all that would endanger the future of the average human kind evolving towards a sattwic state in course of time. He was also fulfilling his dharma as a friend to whom he had given his promise to help regain his throne.

The longish answer is that he let Sugriva fight Vali and waited until Vali committed the adharma of drawing the energy of the opponent (Sugriva) using his occult capacities. At that point the battle became unequal and he intervened when his friend called in distress after giving his best to defeat the wrong doer and yet failing.

He could have challenged Vali instead of shooting from behind the trees? A challenge between the two would be unequal either ways. None could defeat Vali in hand to hand combat as he had the magical capacity of sucking half the energy of the opponent. And if Rama challenged him to a fight with his bow then Vali would be no match. Shooting arrow from behind the trees was a way of implying that the two sides were yet matched in some way. On one side the impact of the arrow was softened greatly by shooting through the 7 trees. It was a match of strength though on unequal grounds.

Sri Rama himself explained to Vali why he did what he did. It was very simply to uphold the dharma. Vali had lived his life with adharma and to punish the evil doer was more important than anything else.

The spiritual answer of course is that the Divine acts according to another vision and to fulfill the work he has come to do which includes clearing the passage towards the future, paritranaya sadhunam vinashaya ca duskritam. He is not here to satisfy human notions of morality or conform to human ways of thinking and standards of conduct.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

So, I’ve been working on figuring out how to carry out lake restoration of Dal Lake using metagenomics, and I feel like it’s very expensive, interesting, but it’s not interesting to me. Sir says it’ll be a novel work and I tried to read it. But I’m not intrigued or feel it apart from the fact that it is a good chance to see what’s beneath the surface. 🚣🏼😐

To start with whoever wants to send you to Dal lake does not know the ground situation there. Asked him if he has visited Srinagar and when? Is he taking guarantee for your safety? It is not normal to send a research student all the way up there to do a study, even if it be interesting. The purpose of PhD is primarily to…

Read More >

Dearest Alok Da, a question concerning the lines in Savitri. These lines describe Death’s appearance: “Half-seen in clouds appeared a sombre face; Night’s dusk tiara was his matted hair, The ashes of the pyre his forehead’s sign.” (pg.595) – Is this a description of Lord Shiva? Is it Lord Shiva, or even Lord Yama, who is appearing as Death? Because matted hair and ashes on the forehead are worn by Lord Shiva and Lord Yama. 🙏🏻🌼

He stood in silence and in darkness wrapped,
A figure motionless, a shadow vague,
Girt with the terrors of his secret sword….

Read More >

I had some suspicions regarding Advaita Vedanta and wanted to clear that up. The philosophy or the sect of Advaita Vedanta seems to be quite a problematic philosophical school, sometimes even a tool of the Asura. Or at least an Asura used by the divine to utterly break the old moulds of Bharat. 🔥[…]

I very much share your insight. Adwait Vedanta, for that matter all the different schools of Vedanta err by taking one particular realisation to be the ultimate. In doing so they almost unwittingly discredit or discard other equally important and powerful realisations that are needed to complete the picture. It leaves many unanswered …

Read More >