AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Why the Mother’s Agenda was not for everyone🤷‍♂️?

The Mother’s Agenda is a recorded conversation between the Mother and a French disciple who was a new entrant on the scene. Being a rebel by nature, he represented the anguish of the old world seeking for something new and true that can bring back hope to the earth and humanity torn and troubled by the Wars and the hypocrisy of Religions and ideologies. Further, being proficient in French he became the obvious choice for being the Mother’s instrument to document the transformation process that was unfolding in Her and its repercussions upon the world. It was evident that not all would be in a position to understand it and many may actually misunderstand it. It is somewhat like exposing children in primary class to the PhD program.

Besides, as happens with any conversation, the disciple can through a leading question bring out certain statements about people and the work that are contextual. Yet these statements can be turned by unchaste minds into absolute judgments for all times.

Therefore the Mother had asked Nolini da (and Andre) to go through the recording and publish edited portions in the Sri Aurobindo International Centre of Education Bulletin. These later came out as part of Her Collected Works Volume 10, 11 and portions in Words of the Mother.

Whatever portions of the Agenda were considered useful and helpful for all has indeed been published. Here personal comments and contextual statements have obviously been taken out as well as certain details that were considered not necessary for the average reader.

The disciple who was instrumental in recording it wanted the whole thing published without editing. This was in contravention to the Mother’s clear instruction. Besides, the Agenda conversations were nobody’s personal property. They belonged solely to Her and hence their right place was obviously the Ashram Archives.

This difference of viewpoint became wide enough (for reasons best left unsaid) leading to various fissures in the community exposing all the hidden faultlines that are still not fully repaired.

Nevertheless it is already over five decades since the Agenda was completed and hence can surely be read. However since it has been edited by the disciple who recorded it, it is left to the reader to discern how much is his deliberate deflection, how much is a partial truth in a certain context, and sift the chaff from the grain of gold.

My personal feeling based on the entire reading of Their Works is that the Agenda does require a certain psychological and spiritual maturity from the reader and hence it is best read after one has gone through the collected works and has one’s feet steadily upon the Path.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Are the processes of Purification and Transformation the same thing? I have a little confusion. In the process of Purification, we face some adverse forces that are mentioned by Sri Aurobindo in the chapter ‘The difficulties of Transformation’. Are they the same? 🔥🌄[…]

Purification is the indispensable basis for liberation. It means removing the covering and coating of ignorance and falsehood that veils the true self. In the yoga seeking for mukti, the purification has to be less thorough. It is enough to bring some sattwic rectitude in nature, satwasanshuddhi. Transformation proper..

Read More >

Can we understand Sri Aurobindo and His yoga with the physical mind, as you say physical mind never grasps the Truth in its highest sense. So if we feel good by reading Sri Aurobindo or The Mother, even that is from the physical plane, wanting a good, perfect physical life. 😅❤️‍🔥🦋 […]

Yes, it is difficult for the physical mind to shift its fixed position and comfort zones..It feels lost and insecure. But once it accepts the New Idea then it gets firmly established there. It is somewhat like…

Read More >

The talk sounded like you were putting down Marriage as a concept! True, some regions do this horse ride/wasting money, which is in bad taste. However, Marriage as a concept gives the monkey minds a framework. 🥸💍💒[…]

Yes, I agree that for the average human being, these outer frameworks and social institutions do serve a purpose of holding people together. Of course, as I mentioned, marriage or not, love and togetherness can be beautiful and ought to be so. But for that, man needs to evolve beyond the present frameworks, which operate as long as one accepts the limits of dos and don’ts. …

Read More >