AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

If Sita and Rama šŸ¹cannot be even called a happily married couple they why are they given as an example of ideal couple in India, donā€™t you think this example needs to be change?

Rama and Sita are rightly the names that have governed the Hindu psyche for long. What Shiva and Parvati are on the subtle planes, Rama and Sita are on the physical.Ā  True it is that they are never able to lead a ‘typical happily married hereafter’ life. But to the ancient Aryan type, earthly happiness was never a goal worth pursuing. At best it counted among the lesser goals of mankind, Artha and Kama. They were a preparation for the two higher goals, Dharma and Moksha. Rama and Sita were already emancipated and liberated, divine beings so to say, who came as Avatars not to accumulate personal happiness but to set an example, give the Dharma to mankind at that stage. They came to show and explify how to lead a meaningful life amidst every possible challenge, how to keep the truth, the dharma before self and how to rise from the pyre like the great Phoenix. And they did it with a rare greatness opening the path towards an ideal, illumined mind for man. And even today we in India can relate to this ideal as love is not about money success or possession, true love is sacrifice and giving and not about living happily married and that why precisely why Rama and Sita are and should be the ideals of our Indian culture.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share thisā€¦

Related Posts

Dearest Alok da, From lines of Savitri: High seers, moved poets saw the eternal thoughts That, travellers from on high, arrive to us Deformed by our search, tricked by costuming mind,…

It is the actual experience of a god each time he or she takes a human birth. The consciousness of a true, great god is high and vast and pure. But the human consciousness and the human instruments of speech and action, let alone the world conditions do not support this vastness that …

Read More >

My niece who is 12 yrs old doesn’t like sharingšŸ˜„. If she takes her favorite food to school and her friends ask her to share, she doesn’t give or gives a very small piece. If by chance she happens to share a chocolate with girls she doesn’t like, she wants to snatch it away. She is attached to Krishna, and only thing that pacifies her is when we tell her that Krishna likes if she shares what He has given her. She says “I know it’s bad, i know it’s a devil that says this, but I can’t overpower it. It tells me that those girls did bad and said bad things about you, instead of that you shared your things, now you go steal something from them. Or I keep thinking what will I get if I give them”..[conti]

Single child may not be the reason. Rather it is quite unlikely. Children often pick up number of behaviours that they unconsciously notice in significant elders around …

Read More >