AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Ravana being a Shiv bhakta and an intelligent king can we say that he was a good man but took over by the possession of Sita🤔?

Well we cannot totally justify with Ravana as here he represents the retrogressive movement in nature. He wants to undo what has been done through the centuries by the seers and sages. He wants to sow seeds of an aggressive and ambitious type of humanity whose focus is material and technological advancement at the expense of the spiritual side. His idea of liberty is licentiousness typified in the story of his sister Suparnakha and his own life led by lust and blind impulses. He cannot accept dharma since it means effort at self-mastery. He rather prefers to be driven by every impulse to satisfy his desire for selfish gains and personal pleasure.

And yet even Asura is an angel who has strayed from  his true path. The Lord remembers and hence he assumes a earthly body to redeem and restore him to his divine origins which he has forgotten completely. It is this sublime love that leans down to rescue and redeem what is fallen and disturbed and distorted and release the divinity in it that we find in the Ramayana.

This Asura in man is typified in Ravana, once a devotee of the Lord who has hence fallen due to his lust for power and wealth and wanton ambition. Though the main antagonist in the plot, he is not a villain to be simply weeded out of existence, if such a thing were at all possible. Killing Ravana is becomes inevitable only because he refuses to change his ways. The chance is given even uptil the last moments but he refuses and insists on his doctrine of might is right and hence Rama must take the challenge and fight him on his own grounds. With the fall of the Asura and the conversion of the animal the path of humanity is secured at least for a few millenniums until the necessity for the coming of another Avatara arises.

Thus in the end by killing Ravana, Lord Rama shows his compassion as it liberates him and eventually he is converted to a Bhakta of Rama, thus we can say that Ramayana is also a story of transformation of a Asura.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Are the processes of Purification and Transformation the same thing? I have a little confusion. In the process of Purification, we face some adverse forces that are mentioned by Sri Aurobindo in the chapter ‘The difficulties of Transformation’. Are they the same? 🔥🌄[…]

Purification is the indispensable basis for liberation. It means removing the covering and coating of ignorance and falsehood that veils the true self. In the yoga seeking for mukti, the purification has to be less thorough. It is enough to bring some sattwic rectitude in nature, satwasanshuddhi. Transformation proper..

Read More >

Can we understand Sri Aurobindo and His yoga with the physical mind, as you say physical mind never grasps the Truth in its highest sense. So if we feel good by reading Sri Aurobindo or The Mother, even that is from the physical plane, wanting a good, perfect physical life. 😅❤️‍🔥🦋 […]

Yes, it is difficult for the physical mind to shift its fixed position and comfort zones..It feels lost and insecure. But once it accepts the New Idea then it gets firmly established there. It is somewhat like…

Read More >

The talk sounded like you were putting down Marriage as a concept! True, some regions do this horse ride/wasting money, which is in bad taste. However, Marriage as a concept gives the monkey minds a framework. 🥸💍💒[…]

Yes, I agree that for the average human being, these outer frameworks and social institutions do serve a purpose of holding people together. Of course, as I mentioned, marriage or not, love and togetherness can be beautiful and ought to be so. But for that, man needs to evolve beyond the present frameworks, which operate as long as one accepts the limits of dos and don’ts. …

Read More >