AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

I have this thing where I am good at holding conversation, I can talk to people if required. For example to friends, family, professional settings. But I feel silence communicates so much more. I feel talking is fine if the other person requires it, but I feel mutual silence or atleast my silence/quietude is able to express and convey so much more than outward speaking. Does this hold truth? Obviously I don’t want to be a monk and not speak, but I just feel people are missing out big time on the peace and grandiosity of expression through mute conversation or at-least limited conversation. Is this even possible or is it just in my own head? I feel like I’m just conversing due to the other person’s inability to understand my lack of words…so I just do it to make sure they feel cared about. But, personally, I feel conversation definitely has its own purpose and utility, but majority of the time it’s a useless means for people trying to find a way to show friendship, affection, and a means of reassuring the other person of their care…thoughts🙃?

In complete agreement with you. Though the faculty of speech is the highest so far, it is an evolutionary gift to mankind. Its purpose is not only to communicate and express what is within us but as a means of ascension to higher states of consciousness using the power of thought within us. It is precisely for this reason that the less we speak, the more powerful our thought tends to become. Not only does it become more powerful it develops the capacity of communicating without speech. So your understanding is quite true and there is a deeper basis to it. 

However since communication is a two-way process, it requires a certain degree of receptivity for the other person to receive the unspoken communication. As yet it is very rare and hence a lack of expression is often taken as an absence of feelings. Hence it is best to speak little, speak sensibly instead of a meaningless chatter which disperses the mental energies and, to speak from the depths of the heart.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Dear Sir, there is a difference between the Rama of sage Valmiki’s Ramayana (not read, but heard in bits and pieces) and the Rama of Tulsidas’s Ramacharitmanas (read/heard the whole, many times, love it), I prefer Tulsidas’s version. Please share your thoughts. 🏹📙😊🙏🏻🪷🌄

The Rama of Valmiki and the Rama of Tulsidas are the one and the same Rama, except that both see from a different vantage point. Valmiki is a seer straight from the Vedic Age, hence he sees Rama from the spiritual heights. …

Read More >

I am sorry to say this, but in general, your generation is the most confused gen. It was the first gen where, in general, the majority of middle-class families got their first college grads. In doing so, they left home for studies in urban areas and did services in a modern environment. 👨🏼‍🦳🧔🏼‍♀️👨🏻‍👩🏻‍👧🏻‍👦🏻🏡🌷[…]

Personally, I never identified with any generation or the social milieu then or now. I believe one should think independently, reflect, discern and then make conscious choices. Society, then as well as now is always behind

Read More >

Thank you so much and much Gratitude to you. Your Talks help me so much in a way I can’t even imagine. And your kind Guidance also brought Light into Sadhana. Much, much Gratitude to you. Sorry for too many questions, forgive me, thinking like the Mother’s ignorant baby child… 😊🙏🏻🌻❤️‍🔥

Brothers don’t seek forgiveness or need to express gratitude. That you feel helped and moving on the path opening to Her Grace is reward enough. May Her Grace and Love lead you to your true goal. 

Read More >