AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

I haven’t read everything fully what Sri Aurobindo has written about non veg, but I came across something saying that eating non-vegetarian food is not so bad. However, the Mother has a different view. I don’t remember her exact words, but she believes it is not right🤨.

Yogis are way above these ideas anyways. Sri Ramakrishna loved prawns. Swami Vivekanand ate meat. How does it matter as long as they realised God within which , i am afraid many vegetarians do not even bother about. This is what Swami Vivekanand and Sri Aurobindo cautioned about, the narrower Hinduism of the kitchen and the cooking pot which stops at cleansing the body but cares little to cleanse the mind and soul. 


And also, Some non-vegetarians say that we cannot be sure animals feel more pain than plants, and they ask how we can know about their suffering. They also question whose suffering is greater and how do you know that animals feel more pain than plants.

It is not about life or about suffering. It is about the consciousness embedded within what is being eaten. Plants contain life that sustains matter which is what is needed. Lower animals contain the sting of pain. But the higher animals which is generally not to be eaten, the quadrupeds, is because they have emptions and experience fear, rage, grief which is not good for the one consuming it, especially when the process of taking life is deliberate and slow as in halal. It is a cruel act and keeps us tied to the animal state. Hence the prescription. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I was just reading Karl marx’s Short essay on the power of money, he wonders about this bewildering engimatic force which shapes our life and history and he quotes many of Sri Aurobindo’s favourite poets like Shakespeare and Goethe on how this mysterious force turns things upside down, Sri Aurobindo in Savitri covers everything about the cosmos even if it’s just a few lines but there’s isn’t anything about money if I am not wrong. Why is this so? Why is such a gigantic subject ignored🤔?

First of all there are a few presumptions there. Though Sri Aurobindo has appreciated Shakespeare and Goethe his appreciation of them is part of a general appreciation of all that is good in mankind. He has, for..

Read More >

I had a question on a particular phrase in Savitri. “The universe is an endless masquerade: For nothing here is utterly what it seems; It is a dream-fact vision of a truth Which but for the dream would not be wholly true, A phenomenon stands out significant Against dim backgrounds of eternity; “What exactly is a “dream-fact vision of a truth”? Either we have dreams, or we have facts, two different order of realities🤔.

To think of the language of Savitri, it feels like Sri Aurobindo has stretched the bounds of the finite to the utmost, by capturing the

Read More >