AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Why did Rama 🏹 not change the law if he was the king and why did he not change the law for the love of his wife? Can we not say that for him Sita did not mean much?

Even though Rama’s Rajdharma compels him to abandon Sita to keep intact his people together as well as to set an unprecedented example of public probity where a king is subject to the same laws that a commoner is. For such was the law at that time, a law no doubt harsh and even cruel by our modern standards, yet a law meant to curb the excess of  animal and rakshasic elements that still governed the human. Rama had come to humanise this subhuman layer of humanity but first he must himself come under the law to restore confidence in the people before changing it.

He does change the law. Until then kings generally married more than one woman. The king had to have his wife by his side for many kinds of ritualistic occasions. One of his duties was to have a progeny to continue the lineage. We can only imagine the pressure that Sri Rama must have had to face. But he remained unmarried after the separation from Sita. It is perhaps a singular example in history of a most powerful king who had only one wife and even through the separation remained faithful and loyal to her. And yet it was Sita, his love, his life whom he had to sacrifice to set an example of Rajdharma, of being at par with a commoner as far as the law of the times is concerned. That is why Rama is considered an Ideal Man, Purushottam, who lived by dharma as rigorously as one could imagine. In fact he raised the bar so high that it is not easy even to come near it. No wonder he has inspired and continues to inspire generations through the millennium. Rama remains unconquerable not only in outer war but also in the inner battlefield of life, a perfect example of the very best, noblest, srestha, the epitome of the Aryan Man.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

It’s been five years since our marriage, and I’m beginning to realise that there is a strong need in me to follow my own truth and become more of an individual in my own right. I feel that, in many ways, Indian society doesn’t really encourage women to live as individuals. ❤️‍🔥👩🏼🌱[…]

First things first. The first necessity of any and every human being is to arrive at his maximum possibility, to realise his or her highest ideal and conception. All the rest comes later. This is especially so for this Age where the old bases and old forms including the..

Read More >

Thank you, Alok da, for answering my question from yesterday on a passage of the Synthesis of Yoga. However, I would like to clarify one specific point based on the understanding I shared earlier. Let me take a hypothetical example. Suppose, for a particular individual, the Divine Intention/Will is that he should go through a life of considerable struggle. ❤️‍🔥😊🙏🏻🌼[…]

I understand the difficulty. The Vedas speak of basically two operating systems to which we are subject. The first is when we are being schooled in Ignorance, Avidya. Then we operate through the ego which is actually like a shell within which our true soul is developing from its seed state to a realised divinity. During this phase we are given a…

Read More >

Mother had a vision of Nagas guarding wealth. Who are these people? Where do they live? Mother asked him, “Will you allow me to enter?” He was guarding so much wealth. She described him as tall and stunning, but he said, “If I allow you, they will kill me. You have to first control the sex instinct among human beings. What is this?” 💎🪙💎🐍[…]

The Gita speaks of the struggle between the forces of the daivi order and the asuric type. Yes, eventually the Divine Will prevails and wins the victory, but before that the struggle and the conflict are there. …

Read More >
× Bonne Fete