AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

They call Rama 🏹 an ideal man but I think he must have been ideal thousands of years back, how can he be ideal and relatable today?

It’s a mistake to think that Rama is not relatable today as even today he is an example of a perfect man. Rama lays the foundation of individual ethics and public morality on the edifice of Dharma. He shows by example what it means to be an ideal son, ideal brother, ideal friend, ideal husband and an ideal king, in short, the epitome of an ideal Man. Calm and courageous, Rama combines within him unparalleled valour and strength with tender love and care which itself makes his personality so lovable. An obedient son who carries no bitterness against his irresponsible father and a scheming step mother, a brother who would easily renounce his rightful kingdom for his younger brother and give his life to protect them, a friend who embraces all kinds, the poor, the downtrodden, the outcast, those of lowly birth or much inferior to him in wisdom and intelligence. Caring even for the least animal and flower and tree, he is ready to fight their whom he has accepted as friends, embracing all, abandoning none, quick to forgive even his arch rival and enemy if he shows genuine repentance, Rama is indeed the ideal friend who would never break a promise, once given. As a husband, he comes out as a tenderly caring person who would want to fulfil her wishes and accept her counsel, protect her against the Rakshasa menace and when abducted by deceit and cunning, takes upon himself to defend her against the most formidable of opponents, Ravana. He is the one (and perhaps the only) example of unflinching loyalty not only towards friends but towards his wife. Rejecting all advances made towards him to win his affection by the beautiful Asuri princess Sooparnkha, Rama is the standing example of what it means to be faithful to one’s wife. He marches with an army of monkeys to rescue his wife against all odds.

Even though his Rajdharma compels him to abandon Sita to keep intact his people together as well as to set an unprecedented example of public probity where a king is subject to the same laws that a commoner is. For such was the law at that time, a law no doubt harsh and even cruel by our modern standards, yet a law meant to curb the excess of  animal and rakshasic elements that still governed the human. Rama had come to humanise this subhuman layer of humanity but first he must himself come under the law to restore confidence in the people before changing it.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

But why should these things happen to someone who doesn’t even have any Spiritual inclination? He was only visiting to understand my emotional connection to Pondicherry and the Ashram. More than that, he had an academic interest in philosophy, nothing else. This isn’t a common occurrence, is it? 🤔❤️‍🔥🌻🍃

These things are not uncommon. The subconscious mind especially the vital nature has many things hidden within it that show up under the pressure of this place, especially in those who are not ready. The Mother has …

Read More >

Even when every cell of the Mother’s body had undergone Transformation, what were the reasons that the external Nature of the body remained disease-ridden and perishable? Is the Transformation of Cells different from the Transformation of the outer physical body? 👵🏼🙄🙏🏻🌷✨

There is a detailed talk as well as write up on this subject. In brief, if we follow the process closely it is evident that She was working upon groups of cells one by one. There were no diseases in Her body but as…

Read More >