AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

We have an independent food scientist in India called the Millet Man, Dr Khader Vali. My question to you is all food science just relative in nature? Does body finally adapt to whatever food is given to it, as long as it is healthy and eaten in moderation, and produce health? Does mindset top food science?πŸ²πŸ›πŸ₯—πŸ₯‘

He is trying to wean people off high glycemic foods like polished rice and wheat and introduce millets instead, mainly as they regulate blood sugar very well and keep diseases off for a longer time because of their rich nutritional content. He says we have forgotten how to eat in a simple satwik way and modern food is all about satisfying our palate without thinking about the benefits for the body.

Food Science is relative because it does not take into consideration the local conditions, the general occupation, and the mental / genetic / heredity conditioning of human beings towards the foods they eat.

Firstly, Nature provides certain foods suited in certain climatic conditions.

Secondly, the body and mind adapt to foods that have been staple for long in a community. To say that a particular food will or must create certain affects invariably is too mathematical to be true. 

Thirdly, – and I am bit surprised at this, that the person considers Millet as Sattwic based on its ingredients. The guna classification of things has little to do with the quantitative composition but more with the quality. 

Most importantly I find this excessive preoccupation with food, even so-called healthy food, so silly. Food should be simple, freshly prepared, natural to a place, taken in moderation and then forgotten completely. All this obsession with food is so harmful for the consciousness in general. I have seen children suffering from these food obsessions who have stopped rice and wheat and take only Millet, have anorexia and other issues. Food has its place but a relatively small place in our overall well-being, not something to be so much occupied with. 

As to diseases there are many factors of which food is perhaps of little importance. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Is drinking small quantities of alcohol really that bad? Most people I know consume alcohol in some measure. I noticed that the ones who quit it completely face backlash from Society. For example, I heard business people say that you can’t trust a person who doesn’t drink. πŸ₯‚πŸ’¬πŸΈπŸŽΆ[…]

It is not a question of good or bad from a moral point of view. But drinking alcohol is certainly harmful for the physical, as well as psychological and I would even say spiritual health. The list of physical problems is too long and generally too well known to elucidate. …

Read More >

Dada, there is a professor at IISC who is a sadhaka in the sampradaya of Madhvacharya, and he says that, according to him, the way to find your Swadharma is to do what you can persistently despite failure. I want to ask, is this a good way of practically knowing, or is it too reductionist? And according to you, what can be the best practical way for a young child?πŸ§’πŸ“šβœ¨πŸŒ±

That is one way of looking at it. But a slightly negative and outer way of looking at it. There are plenty of things we do which do not involve success or failure. We do it because we find a natural joy in it. This spontaneous joy …

Read More >

Probably 4-5 years ago, I had read a book named ‘Immortal Talks’ by an author named Shunya. Last time I checked, the author hadn’t revealed their identity. So the book is about Hanuman and how He imparts the ultimate knowledge to this particular tribe of people every 40 years and the story revolves around it. You can call its genre fiction. As I read that, I felt such a deep connection with Hanuman. πŸ“–πŸΉπŸ›•πŸŒ„πŸŒ»[…]

It is not a dream but a real contact with the ever living legendary Hanuman who continues to help the simple hearted devotees upon earth to turn towards dharma.Β 

Read More >