AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

Why did Sri Krishna allow Shakuni to cheat and win in the unjust game of dice😠?

Because he wanted to prepare the Pandavas; he wanted them to achieve victory rightly and uphold the principles of Dharma. If they had not been prepared and taken over the kingdom prematurely, there was a risk that they themselves might have been another tyrant. Therefore, he allowed the one who was destined to become a great leader to fail—repeatedly. This is how a true leader is shaped. A leader who rises without struggle will never fight for you or work for you, as he is likely to fail and take you down with him. Power that cones without struggle often corrupts the man who receives it. Hence we see in ancient times that even the prince who was going to inherit the power had to go through the gurukula to become rightly deserving.

But the Pandavas were chosen for something much greater, to govern not just a kingdom but to establish a nation governed by dharma, hence the sever training through the school of nature. In fact had Shakuni not cheated them so badly they would have never waged war against the Dhritrastrians leading to a permanent fissure in India between two centres of power, one representing dharma with the Pandavas at the centre and the other representing adharma with Duryodhan and Shakuni at the helm of affairs. Shakuni’s deceit gave the occasion and eventually the entire refusal of Duryodhan to the peace proposal by Sri Krishna became the excuse for the great Mahabharata war. As a result, through and despite the bloodshed, there was eventually one indivisible Bharatvarsha governed by Yudhidthira who was an embodiment of dharma.  

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I was just reading Karl marx’s Short essay on the power of money, he wonders about this bewildering engimatic force which shapes our life and history and he quotes many of Sri Aurobindo’s favourite poets like Shakespeare and Goethe on how this mysterious force turns things upside down, Sri Aurobindo in Savitri covers everything about the cosmos even if it’s just a few lines but there’s isn’t anything about money if I am not wrong. Why is this so? Why is such a gigantic subject ignored🤔?

First of all there are a few presumptions there. Though Sri Aurobindo has appreciated Shakespeare and Goethe his appreciation of them is part of a general appreciation of all that is good in mankind. He has, for..

Read More >

I had a question on a particular phrase in Savitri. “The universe is an endless masquerade: For nothing here is utterly what it seems; It is a dream-fact vision of a truth Which but for the dream would not be wholly true, A phenomenon stands out significant Against dim backgrounds of eternity; “What exactly is a “dream-fact vision of a truth”? Either we have dreams, or we have facts, two different order of realities🤔.

To think of the language of Savitri, it feels like Sri Aurobindo has stretched the bounds of the finite to the utmost, by capturing the

Read More >