AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

In one of your talks you mentioned that feminism is not aping men, so can you share What is true feminism πŸ‘© as I feel women have a wrong concept of it as they seem to be in competition with men and I feel this is causing problems with the balance of the world?

Men and women represent two aspects of One Reality, passive and dynamic, ideative and pragmatic. They are equal in their differences and different in their equality. Indeed all creation is full of endless variety and variation creating a rich diversity on the surfaces. But in the depths there always is unity and oneness. So too man and woman are one in their fundamental depths but they are different in their personality and functionality complementing each other. Thus, generally speaking, men are more analytical and head oriented whereas women are more intuitive and heart oriented. While men may have more brute muscle power and lung power as they say, women have more soft powers and psychic powers. This differentiation serves two purposes in creation.

Firstly, it reproduces symbolically the play of Purusha and Prakriti in real life forms. Secondly, it fulfils nature’s purpose of continuing the race and creating variations through the mutual attraction of apparent opposites that are in fact complimentary to each other.

They are equal in their deep essence and the One Divine Presence is equally accessible to both. This truth, as the Sanatana Dharma recognised is beautifully expressed in the symbol of Ishwara, the eternal masculine and Shakti, the eternal feminine wherein both are necessary for upholding the balance of creation. Religions that do not recognize the feminine element end up repressing women and thereby grow increasingly crude and hard until the feminine element revolts and finds release as we see in the Western culture.

Where the revolt does not take place the religion becomes increasingly male dominated and cruder and harder by the decades. In India too, under the alien spell and due to the predominance of the masculine element stressed in Vedanta, something similar began to happen but because the religion itself carries the correcting element it never took to an extreme and swung back into a balance again.

What is needed for each to arrive at their fullness, not by suppressing the masculine or feminine element but by ennobling and divinising, uplifting each to its highest acme of possibility. This is the first freedom or liberation needed, that a woman discovers herself as Devi, power, by uncovering the Eternal Feminine, the Divine Mother in Her various moods and aspects and personalities. So too for men as well.

Secondly they must discover the hidden truth of the masculine in the woman and feminine in the man so that they experience wholeness and completeness as we see symbolized in ardhnarishwara. Thus liberated from their littleness as well as from the ordinary need of each other for nature’s inferior play they can become true complimentaries in the New Creation.

On the other hand if they simply imitate each other on the surface and try to force change themselves outwardly then they misread Nature’s Intent of a new type and will end up diminoshing each other and create confusion and eventually a weak, impotent and disintegrating society towards which the woke movement is pushing us.

In other words the woman must discover her own highest feminine potential as well as the masculine element within her. The man must discover his own highest masculine potential as well as the feminine element within him. They can do this by the journey of self discovery of the Divine within each one. It is this that will bring freedom and not the way we are being told by the Western model.

Let India the land that has respected both and created the true types of each show and lead the way.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Is it just a coincidence that Sri Krishna was the de facto ruler of Dwarka and Sri Aurobindo started his work as the de facto ruler of Gujarat? I feel as if it indicates that he has started his work from where Sri Krishna left. 🦚πŸͺ·πŸƒπŸŒ„

There are quite a few other similarities. Sri Krishna was brought up in a foster home away from his parents and so was Sri Aurobindo. Sri Krishna came back and freed his people from the tyranny of Kansa and so did Sri Aurobindo return and gave himself to the work of freeing his motherland from the tyranny of the British. In the ….

Read More >

In Sri Aurobindo’s writings, he very much stresses the need for sexual discipline and Brahmacharya during the student phase of life, and I remember reading Schopenhauer on how the childlike curiosity, inquiry and energy get directed towards sexual mating with the coming of puberty.πŸ˜―πŸ¦‹βœ¨πŸ’–[…]

Nature has created this world in a many-tiered way. The animal plan is its beginning, the animal humanity and the higher humanity are the middle, but the godlike humanity and the divinised superhumanity is its culmination…

Read More >

In Sri Aurobindo’s philosophy, the Divine consciousness manifests into the world through Involution, and human suffering is often described as a side effect of this evolutionary process. πŸ€”πŸ˜£πŸ₯€πŸŒ„[…]

The first thing to understand is that the Divine who chose to plunge into the ignorance with the full knowledge of the aftermath of suffering and the eventual multiplication of delight, the manifold delight of multiplicity, did it with the full consent of our central being, that aspect of the soul that remains unfallen and hence always in the bliss of the eternal company of the Divine. The soul in us took it as a great adventure in which it plunged along …

Read More >