AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

In one of your talks you mentioned that feminism is not aping men, so can you share What is true feminism 👩 as I feel women have a wrong concept of it as they seem to be in competition with men and I feel this is causing problems with the balance of the world?

Men and women represent two aspects of One Reality, passive and dynamic, ideative and pragmatic. They are equal in their differences and different in their equality. Indeed all creation is full of endless variety and variation creating a rich diversity on the surfaces. But in the depths there always is unity and oneness. So too man and woman are one in their fundamental depths but they are different in their personality and functionality complementing each other. Thus, generally speaking, men are more analytical and head oriented whereas women are more intuitive and heart oriented. While men may have more brute muscle power and lung power as they say, women have more soft powers and psychic powers. This differentiation serves two purposes in creation.

Firstly, it reproduces symbolically the play of Purusha and Prakriti in real life forms. Secondly, it fulfils nature’s purpose of continuing the race and creating variations through the mutual attraction of apparent opposites that are in fact complimentary to each other.

They are equal in their deep essence and the One Divine Presence is equally accessible to both. This truth, as the Sanatana Dharma recognised is beautifully expressed in the symbol of Ishwara, the eternal masculine and Shakti, the eternal feminine wherein both are necessary for upholding the balance of creation. Religions that do not recognize the feminine element end up repressing women and thereby grow increasingly crude and hard until the feminine element revolts and finds release as we see in the Western culture.

Where the revolt does not take place the religion becomes increasingly male dominated and cruder and harder by the decades. In India too, under the alien spell and due to the predominance of the masculine element stressed in Vedanta, something similar began to happen but because the religion itself carries the correcting element it never took to an extreme and swung back into a balance again.

What is needed for each to arrive at their fullness, not by suppressing the masculine or feminine element but by ennobling and divinising, uplifting each to its highest acme of possibility. This is the first freedom or liberation needed, that a woman discovers herself as Devi, power, by uncovering the Eternal Feminine, the Divine Mother in Her various moods and aspects and personalities. So too for men as well.

Secondly they must discover the hidden truth of the masculine in the woman and feminine in the man so that they experience wholeness and completeness as we see symbolized in ardhnarishwara. Thus liberated from their littleness as well as from the ordinary need of each other for nature’s inferior play they can become true complimentaries in the New Creation.

On the other hand if they simply imitate each other on the surface and try to force change themselves outwardly then they misread Nature’s Intent of a new type and will end up diminoshing each other and create confusion and eventually a weak, impotent and disintegrating society towards which the woke movement is pushing us.

In other words the woman must discover her own highest feminine potential as well as the masculine element within her. The man must discover his own highest masculine potential as well as the feminine element within him. They can do this by the journey of self discovery of the Divine within each one. It is this that will bring freedom and not the way we are being told by the Western model.

Let India the land that has respected both and created the true types of each show and lead the way.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I remember once reading in Sri Aurobindo’s commentary on the Isha Upanishad that one cannot become a Brahmin without first becoming a Kshatriya. I believe that I never had the Kshatriya element developed sufficiently within me, and it has always been a source of embarrassment and insecurity for me as a man. 💪🙏🏻🪷[…]

He said both are needed. But these are things ingrained within us. Brahmin and Kshatriya are not  soul states, inner innate temperaments and not so much of outer actions. Nevertheless everything can be developed by practice. By taking the challenges of life, through vigorous physical exercises, by praying for strength, by reading …

Read More >

Bhaiya, Rishi Panchami fast is coming up, and I read the story behind it. Honestly, I found it quite absurd. The story talks about a woman unknowingly breaking certain rules during menstruation, cooking food that her husband eats, and then both of them facing severe karmic consequences in their next life. 🪷🙏🏻 […]

Yes, all these things have been added much later and have no authority in the main  Scriptures. It is a story added in some of the Puranas, mainly I suppose to enforce rules of hygiene for women during the menstrual period. This was one of the ways to instil certain hygiene practices through fear. It has no meaning now. Most of the fasts …

Read More >

How should we understand deities like Subrahmanyeshwara (Skanda/Murugan) and Vinayaka (Ganesha)? Are they individual divine beings, cosmic powers of the One Divine, or symbols of different aspects of consciousness? How should an aspirant in Sri Aurobindo’s Yoga relate to them in practice? 🙏🏻✨

The four original gods, Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh and, behind them all Krishna, are, in their origin, the four aspects of the One Divine, named in Indian spiritual thought as Sacchidananda. Sat (सत) is infinite existence from which Brahma ji emerges. Chit is Chit-tapas, Consciousness and Force from which Hari or Vishnu ji and Hara or Shiv ji …

Read More >