AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Ravana being a Shiv bhakta and an intelligent king can we say that he was a good man but took over by the possession of Sita🤔?

Well we cannot totally justify with Ravana as here he represents the retrogressive movement in nature. He wants to undo what has been done through the centuries by the seers and sages. He wants to sow seeds of an aggressive and ambitious type of humanity whose focus is material and technological advancement at the expense of the spiritual side. His idea of liberty is licentiousness typified in the story of his sister Suparnakha and his own life led by lust and blind impulses. He cannot accept dharma since it means effort at self-mastery. He rather prefers to be driven by every impulse to satisfy his desire for selfish gains and personal pleasure.

And yet even Asura is an angel who has strayed from  his true path. The Lord remembers and hence he assumes a earthly body to redeem and restore him to his divine origins which he has forgotten completely. It is this sublime love that leans down to rescue and redeem what is fallen and disturbed and distorted and release the divinity in it that we find in the Ramayana.

This Asura in man is typified in Ravana, once a devotee of the Lord who has hence fallen due to his lust for power and wealth and wanton ambition. Though the main antagonist in the plot, he is not a villain to be simply weeded out of existence, if such a thing were at all possible. Killing Ravana is becomes inevitable only because he refuses to change his ways. The chance is given even uptil the last moments but he refuses and insists on his doctrine of might is right and hence Rama must take the challenge and fight him on his own grounds. With the fall of the Asura and the conversion of the animal the path of humanity is secured at least for a few millenniums until the necessity for the coming of another Avatara arises.

Thus in the end by killing Ravana, Lord Rama shows his compassion as it liberates him and eventually he is converted to a Bhakta of Rama, thus we can say that Ramayana is also a story of transformation of a Asura.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Poverty

It is a world which has emerged from the Inconscient and these things [poverty and misery] are results of the imperfect working of the human mind which, being born into the ignorant life and matter, has to learn by effort …

Read More >

Alok da, I was going through this work by the philosopher Descartes called Rules for the Direction of the Mind. So much of this work is about how to better purify the various human faculties of sense perception, memory, judgment, imagination, etc., so that one can observe minute facts of nature with precision and without prejudiced universal presuppositions and arrive at a true universal knowledge, which is arrived at only after mastery of minute particulars. 🇮🇳🔬📖🌄[…]

Certainly the Hindus knew the various means of purifying the mind and intelligence and, during the heydays of ancient India, the Vedic period and even much later, they did turn it both inwards and outwards. That is how they discovered such wonderful things which included plastic surgery, an elaborate pharmacopeia, warcraft and deadly weapons, principles of politics and administration, rules of mathematics and chemistry, linguistics and …

Read More >

Sir, is whatever happens with us is always for our best? 🙏🏻🌼

The Mother has given a very beautiful and complete answer to this.

‘Is it really the best that always happens?… It is clear that all that has happened had to happen: it could not be otherwise—by the universal determinism it had to happen. But we can say so only after it has happened, not before. For the problem of the very best that can happen is an individual problem, whether the individual be a nation or a single human being; and all depends upon the personal attitude. If, in the presence of circumstances…

Read More >