AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER

Can you please explain, ‘Break up in love💗is wake up in life.’

I can’t say that I completely agree with this sentence which claims to be based on Buddhism. No great teacher, certainly not Buddha would advice this way of awakening which, besides does not last long as a new attraction replaces the old. This apart what normally passes off in the name of love is mostly attractions, attachments, affinities and infatuation. True love does not depend upon loss of the loved but burns as a steady flame in the secret chambers of the soul. It needs no reciprocation and hence is not hurt or feels resentment, disappointments or feel heart broken. 

This apart, the sentence possibly implies that when the ‘heart breaks’, one ‘wakes up’ to the sense of transience of earthly life. It is a state of tamasic vairagya leading to a recoil from human relationships. This can, sometimes become an instrument for waking up to the quest of something Permanent as we see in the life of the great poet Kalidasa, Tulsidas and to an extent Valmiki. One can feel in such moments the illusoriness of all human striving, the utter meaninglessness of the pursuit of desire. The saying quoted in the image is advising us to seize on this moment and strive rightly for the true things. 

However most lose the moment and either fall into despair or else after a short period of disappointment turn towards other forms and faces. Thus life goes on endlessly driven upon the wheel of pleasure and pain, losses and gains. But the thinking man, the intelligent person raises this question as to why is it so and starts on a deeper quest to solve the riddle of life. This is what seems to be implied.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I was just reading Karl marx’s Short essay on the power of money, he wonders about this bewildering engimatic force which shapes our life and history and he quotes many of Sri Aurobindo’s favourite poets like Shakespeare and Goethe on how this mysterious force turns things upside down, Sri Aurobindo in Savitri covers everything about the cosmos even if it’s just a few lines but there’s isn’t anything about money if I am not wrong. Why is this so? Why is such a gigantic subject ignored🤔?

First of all there are a few presumptions there. Though Sri Aurobindo has appreciated Shakespeare and Goethe his appreciation of them is part of a general appreciation of all that is good in mankind. He has, for..

Read More >

I had a question on a particular phrase in Savitri. “The universe is an endless masquerade: For nothing here is utterly what it seems; It is a dream-fact vision of a truth Which but for the dream would not be wholly true, A phenomenon stands out significant Against dim backgrounds of eternity; “What exactly is a “dream-fact vision of a truth”? Either we have dreams, or we have facts, two different order of realities🤔.

To think of the language of Savitri, it feels like Sri Aurobindo has stretched the bounds of the finite to the utmost, by capturing the

Read More >