AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Can you explain to me the difference between brain🤯 and mind ? Can you rationally explain the existence of something beyond the physical organ. To me it seems obvious that everybody is different because of genetic makeup, their environment etc. but Roshni is saying there is something beyond brain that operates and tried to explain but I can’t see the logic in it nor understand what she’s trying to explain it’s too complex.

That things, even material things exist beyond the limits of the senses is well known, isn’t it. The universe is teeming with very small objects that the eyes cannot see, the ears cannot hear because the sense organs are limited by their present evolutionary capacity.  Even ordinarily dogs and early humanity not corrupted and conditioned by the rational mind’s limitations perceive things that we do not. That is how certain tribes and animals sensed the tsunami and escaped it. The limits of our sight is not the limit of Light and the limit of our hearing is not the limit of vibrational frequencies that exist in the universe. 

What about the mind? Here too we see that there are some minds that can assimilate deep and complex subjects, whereas others struggle with basics. I am not speaking of the mentally challenged but in the general mass of humanity. The intelligence may range from 110 to 220 or more. What is the reason for this difference? The genetic theory of IQ has been disproved and the brains studied so far (postmortem) have been basically the same. So what makes the difference between a Ramanujam, an Einstein and others? Well one simple way to explain it is that the brain is like the hardware or the handset of a mobile. The mind is like the software put into into it, by whom or by what? Well the user, isn’t it? So there is a skinware or the man behind the machine who puts the software. The user is the self within us who uses the same handset and the software for one kind of activity or another. When the self in man is identified with the little surface personality then it uses the brain and body as its conditioning by heredity and circumstances prompts it. But if the Self is identified with something deeper within us then it uses the same body-brain-mind complex differently. 

We can go deeper. What really are the material objects that the senses and mind perceive? Hard facts or constructs of the mind and senses? Science tells us it is all primarily Energy. But what shapes senses and forms out of this formidable primordial Energy? Wherefrom comes the sense of self, if we are simply unconscious genes and brains? What is the neurological basis of attention and awareness that begins from the early animal life and even in plants? What creates the cosmic order out of a senseless whorl of cosmic energy directing it towards meaningful ends, purposeful activities and bringing out of inert material substance living creatures and thinking man itself? To understand this one has to go one step behind and postulate Consciousness as the fundamental basis of the universe. But that will be going far beyond the limits of your present inquiry. Though a number of scientists are already speaking of it.

Now the yogic science already knew these things that are at the cutting edge of scientific thought today. The yogi is able to enlarge and expand his senses, make them receptive to subtler objects and forces through inner evolution and hence perceive things not accessible to the ordinary sensory workings. It is a process not based on any belief or non-belief and is replicable if anyone fulfils the conditions. That is why it is known as yogic science. 

This is a very brief summary background. You may hear some of the podcasts on these issues or read Swami Vivekananda and Sri Aurobindo for delving deeper into it.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

Dada, there is a professor at IISC who is a sadhaka in the sampradaya of Madhvacharya, and he says that, according to him, the way to find your Swadharma is to do what you can persistently despite failure. I want to ask, is this a good way of practically knowing, or is it too reductionist? And according to you, what can be the best practical way for a young child?🧒📚✨🌱

That is one way of looking at it. But a slightly negative and outer way of looking at it. There are plenty of things we do which do not involve success or failure. We do it because we find a natural joy in it. This spontaneous joy …

Read More >

Is drinking small quantities of alcohol really that bad? Most people I know consume alcohol in some measure. I noticed that the ones who quit it completely face backlash from Society. For example, I heard business people say that you can’t trust a person who doesn’t drink. 🥂💬🍸🎶[…]

It is not a question of good or bad from a moral point of view. But drinking alcohol is certainly harmful for the physical, as well as psychological and I would even say spiritual health. The list of physical problems is too long and generally too well known to elucidate. …

Read More >

Yesterday suddenly realised during my prayer with my mother that the seat of the Psychic Being is Highar Vital, in the Hridaya Chakra. Initially, I feel Peace, Bliss and Delight up to the Vishudhi Centre. Suddenly realised that my heart has received The Mother’s Peace and is spreading to all the centre of my all the inner parts and similar to the mother light also. Suddenly feel that the heart centre is doing everything. Alok da, is our Sadhana going in the right direction? Please guide me. 🪷✨💖🕯️

Yes absolutely, the psychic being is behind the heart centre and when open and in the front then all becomes easy and natural. 
Your prayer is a beautiful psychic prayer and the yoga going in the right direction.

Read More >