AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Krishna agreeing not to fight in the battle? Why so? He was God himself so why he agreed not to lift any weapon 🙄?

The Mahabharata war was primarily a war between the two Kuru families. Since Sri Krishna was related to both the Kauravas and the Pandavas. Sri Krishna’s father Vasudeva was brother of Kunti making Sri Krishna a first cousin to the Pandavas. On the other hand Sri Krishna’s son Samba (born through Jambvati daughter of Jambvan) was married to Duryodhana’s daughter Lakshmana making the two closely related to each other.  His active participation on either side would have created further family rift. But chieftains from his army stood rank on both sides, especially Satyaki and Kritvarma. 

Secondly he had in a way foreseen or rather forewilled the result of the war in which the main instrument was Arjuna, chosen as the man of destiny. It was important that the Pandava brothers especially Arjuna is kept safe from the devious designs of the Kauravas. Driving the chariot of Arjuna ensured that they were always together thereby ensuring the victory. His spiritual force constantly accompanying the main hero Arjuna was a much better way to ensure victory especially given the role of charioteer in the battle (see how Salya as charioteer helped in Karna’s defeat) than if they were split and fighting independently. 

Finally as we all know that wars are first won in the mind and then on the battlefield. Planning and strategy are the most important elements in the war and Sri Krishna kept this role to himself.  

Of course I am not bringing in the spiritual dimension wherein Sri Krishna and Arjuna had fought together the battle of the Ages as Nar Narayan. Their coming together was the occult condition of victory against the forces of darkness embodied by the Dhritrastrians. This occult truth of the Divine Force and the human instrument ensuring victory is declared to be one of the profound secrets of all battles, ‘yatra yogeshwar Krishna, yatra partho dhanurdhara, tatra srivijayo…..’. Sri Krishna, during the war was in a Superconscient state as the yogeshwar and not a warrior. This was needed to ensure the victory as indeed it did.

Krishna fighting the war would have risked the life of Arjuna whereas Sri Krishna playing the charioteer of dear Arjuna would ensure his safety (as is evidenced by a number of events such as Jaidratha vadh, saving him from Takshaka Astra of Karna, ensuring death of karna, restraining him from leaping at Dhristdyumna to save Dronachaya, saving him from Bheesma’s wrath etc) and with Arjuna alive and Krishna by his side, the victory was inevitable. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I remember once reading in Sri Aurobindo’s commentary on the Isha Upanishad that one cannot become a Brahmin without first becoming a Kshatriya. I believe that I never had the Kshatriya element developed sufficiently within me, and it has always been a source of embarrassment and insecurity for me as a man. 💪🙏🏻🪷[…]

He said both are needed. But these are things ingrained within us. Brahmin and Kshatriya are not  soul states, inner innate temperaments and not so much of outer actions. Nevertheless everything can be developed by practice. By taking the challenges of life, through vigorous physical exercises, by praying for strength, by reading …

Read More >

Bhaiya, Rishi Panchami fast is coming up, and I read the story behind it. Honestly, I found it quite absurd. The story talks about a woman unknowingly breaking certain rules during menstruation, cooking food that her husband eats, and then both of them facing severe karmic consequences in their next life. 🪷🙏🏻 […]

Yes, all these things have been added much later and have no authority in the main  Scriptures. It is a story added in some of the Puranas, mainly I suppose to enforce rules of hygiene for women during the menstrual period. This was one of the ways to instil certain hygiene practices through fear. It has no meaning now. Most of the fasts …

Read More >

How should we understand deities like Subrahmanyeshwara (Skanda/Murugan) and Vinayaka (Ganesha)? Are they individual divine beings, cosmic powers of the One Divine, or symbols of different aspects of consciousness? How should an aspirant in Sri Aurobindo’s Yoga relate to them in practice? 🙏🏻✨

The four original gods, Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh and, behind them all Krishna, are, in their origin, the four aspects of the One Divine, named in Indian spiritual thought as Sacchidananda. Sat (सत) is infinite existence from which Brahma ji emerges. Chit is Chit-tapas, Consciousness and Force from which Hari or Vishnu ji and Hara or Shiv ji …

Read More >