AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Dear Alok da, since Divine is in all, and all is in the Divine, does it mean that the entire Nature is in all? I felt it is the truth behind our body being made of the elements of panch bhoothas. Is it correct? Could you please elaborate on this?🪔🌅🌟🕊️

Panchbhutas are not all of Nature. There are many other things that are non-material but are still part of Nature, the ego, for example. Now the Divine is not Nature. He is behind and beyond Nature as a living Presence. Take for example yourself. Are you the same as your body or your thoughts or your nature? Evidently no. But equally we and our nature go together, like the light and the lamp, the sun and its energy, the clouds and the rain. They are together even though different. One is the Source, the other is its force and power. So too the Divine is the Supreme Existence from which all other existences derive. Nature is the energy or the wisdom, force and power of the Divine. The body with the panchbhutas, our prana, our emotions, thoughts, mind, etc are all part of Nature. They all emerge from the Divine, exist because of the Divine and return back to the Divine. But the Divine Himself is the Self-existent Truth, and exists even if all else is abolished. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

But doesn’t marriage keep people stable also – or would they drown themselves in alcohol and drugs, as in the West, due to loneliness? Free intimacy is also a hindrance, right? At least it fixes your emotional, physical, and financial needs. To explore higher areas of life… or wouldn’t everyone just live like animals? Osho’s ways were effective in giving an alternative to marriage? 🏡🌿

Marraige is like a double edged sword. If the partner is right it can help create stability. If the partner is not the right one it can lead to chronic unhappiness, conflicts and instability. This is especially true of our times when the real stabilising factor, the family, is broken.

Read More >

In the First Rik of the Rig Veda, Sri Aurobindo describes the nature of the Supreme as Sat-Chit-Ananda across different states of being. While explaining Nirguna and Saguna Sat, he uses phrases like “they nivṛtta, He nivṛtta” and “they pravṛtta, He nivṛtta”, which I find difficult to grasp. ☀️🕉️[…]

The Lord is both pravritti and nivratti, as the Fire and the Sun are both pravritti and nivratti. As Light they simply stand back and illumine the field but as energy they impel all things into dynamic movement. So too, the Divine as knowledge illumines all things with His Intelligence even without entering into them. But as power, Shakti, He

Read More >

Are Self-respect and Ego the same? 🪞🙏🏻

Self respect is one of the forms of the ego. It could be a sattwic or a rajo-sattwic ego but an ego reaction nonetheless. The soul never feels insulted or has any need to defend its respect. One who lives for the Divine is not affected by human opinions. The only thing that matters is closeness to the Divine. The insults and opinions …

Read More >