AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

What supports the person when the Psychic Being is not there? If the Psychic Being doesn’t come at all, as She says (“never!”), then what evolves in the lifetime? Is the spark-soul inside the Psychic Being? 💖[…]

In other words, if the Psychic Being doesn’t come, then does it mean that there is not even the spark-soul present inside the person?

(ref. https://incarnateword.in/cwsa/35/jivatman-spark-soul-and-psychic-being)

It is somewhat like a person watching over a plot or a house, being interested in it but never really living in it. The psychic being in such a person as mentioned above (never entering in the person) is generally not developed enough or, for some reason, finds the field of nature with which it has got associated not ‘good enough’. Therefore, it never gets into any dynamic contact with the mind-life-body constitution of such a person. It has no influence over it whatsoever, with the attendant consequences.

However, by remaining in some kind of a loose contact with the person, the soul draws whatever little experience it can and returns back. The life of such a person is like a pasu (animal).

The spark is there, but buried in the heap of darkness like a spark buried inside smoke.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I feel now that I was never unhappy. Just disillusioned with the world around me after a certain point in life. Needed to find the truth. About people. Reality of time. Other things. Work. Things told/said to me vs my own experience. 🌱🌟 […]

The purpose is inbuilt within us as the tree is held back within the seed. So too the soul within is the seed within and its purpose is to realise, express and thereby fulfil the Divine Possibility or the Divine Purpose within it. It happens through a process of unfolding across lives. As we draw closer to the soul the more we feel conscious of …

Read More >

What is the true identity of “Mām” in Gita 10.3? If Krishna’s physical form is no longer physically accessible post-disappearance, does “Mām” point to the eternal Atman / Supreme Consciousness rather than the embodied Avatara? 📖🕉️

Sri Krishna himself answers this in the Gita. He is not there as the physical Krishna since He declares Krishna as one of his vibhutis, – ‘I am Krishna among the Vrishnis, Rama among those who have paurush….’.

Nor is he the Atman that is present in all. He declares Himself to be both Kshara and Akshara as the Purushottama, the Avatar.

Read More >