AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Our veds divided the society in four different sections (brahman, kshatriya, vaishya, shudr) which has led to todayโ€™s social differences. Is this division justified?๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿชถ๐Ÿ•‰๏ธโ˜€๏ธ

The Vedas didn’t ‘divide’ Society in the Varnas, they simply classified and stratified human beings into four types with seekers of knowledge at the highest; the political, administrative and military as next; business, production, commerce and industry as the third; and the man dealing with physical labour as the last category. This stratification exists everywhere. It is an arrangement of life that is all. But each is required and has its place. The brain in its place and the feet in its own with the heart and belly in between. They are part of one body and each is required for a healthy and complete functioning. 

The Vedic seers simply used this natural arrangement which, in fact every society had and still has. The Vedic seers however assigned to each his place according to innate temperament rather than arbitrarily based on job though that too was a consideration. There is nothing wrong in helping people undertake activities towards which they were temperamentally most suited. 

The problem started when the political and administrative class, the Kshatriyas because arrogant and started deriding the thought-leaders, the Brahmans whose task was to guide and help them take the right decision for the good of all. We see the same today when the political class wants to place the knowledge seekers under their power. The second problem has been when some thinkers disregarded Nature’s hints and arbitrarily divided humanity into only two types, the rich and the poor, the bourgeois and the proliteriat. This broke down the old system and has only added to the conflict and the confusion. After all the Vedic Society with its fourfold order did function much better and smoothly than the chaos we see today. 

The sense of high and low was not the creation of the Rishis who saw each human being as a manifestation of the divine element. By aligning with his innate temperament each served best the divinity within. Besides the idea of rebirth took care of the upward movement of the soul from its identification with the gross physical life towards the subtle realms of thought. It was therefore not a fixed but a supple evolutionary hierarchy.

Later it was no doubt misused both by the Kshatriya and the Brahmin into a rigid class types based on the privilege of birth. Hence it has been broken by the Time Spirit. But in principle it was sound and even today it continues to exist except that the names are different and the outer form has changed. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share thisโ€ฆ

Related Posts

How can i purify my relationship with the Mother? Asking the Divine for too many things seems selfish and at the same time if i make a promise to myself that i will not ask unnecessary things and face difficulties myself seems not the right thing to do. I feel my relationship with Mother is the most valued thing in my life so how do i make it pure.

Surely we can ask the Divine Mother for what we need. Only our relationship should not be confined to that. One should learn to give, to give out of joy, something of oneself, work, actions, money, something for Her Purpose in …

Read More >

Pranam Sir. I want to ask about how to deal with negative anticipations, thoughts, and expectations in our daily life. One of my colleagues always targeting me and quarreling with me over each minor issue or mistake and even insults me in front of juniors. He is visually challenged. ๐ŸŒฟ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ[…]

The best way is to completely ignore him, and if you cannot do so then remain inwardly totally indifferent to him. The best response to people who are hypercritical is complete indifference. The more you try to explain, the more they justify. The more you concede, the more they increase the criticism. But indifference completely flattens them…

Read More >

What does the chant “OM SHANTI” truly signifyโ€”is peace merely the repetition of a sacred word, or a state to be deeply imbibed within the heart? We often define peace simply as the absence of external conflict, agitation, or turbulence, but this surface calmness is only temporary and amounts to nothing more than restraining turbulent emotions. What, then, constitutes real, unshakable inner peace, and how can one truly attain and sustain it? ๐Ÿ•‰๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ

Peace is not an absence of disturbance. Even inertia is free from disturbance. Peace is something positive and powerful, a fundamental foundational status of the Divine, seemingly equal and non-reactive like Shiva bearing and upholding the dance of Kali upon his chest or the ocean holding its tremendous energy by its own power of self-limitation. maryada. It is a state of concentrated ingatheredness like the mountains or a vast Silence …

Read More >