AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

Here in the Agenda, June 6, 1958, the Mother says that she found the first contact with the higher divine in 1910 – but we were under the impression that the Mother was ‘born free’ – how can she only have had contact in 1910? 📕😊🙏🏻🌸[…]

https://incarnateword.in/agenda/01/june-6-1958

This has been answered by Sri Aurobindo in a most beautiful way. 

’17 August 1938

There are many who hold the view that she was human but now embodies the Divine Mother and her “Prayers”, they say, explain this view. But, to my mental conception, to my psychic being, she is the Divine Mother who has consented to put on her the cloak of obscurity and suffering and ignorance so that she can effectively lead us—human beings—to Knowledge and Bliss and Ananda and to the Supreme Lord.

The Divine puts on an appearance of humanity, assumes the outward human nature in order to tread the path and show it to human beings, but does not cease to be the Divine. It is a manifestation that takes place, a manifestation of a growing divine consciousness, not human turning into divine. The Mother was inwardly above the human even in childhood, so the view held by “many” is erroneous.

I also conceive that the Mother’s “Prayers” are meant to show us—the aspiring psychic—how to pray to the Divine.

Yes.’

(Ref. https://incarnateword.in/cwm/01/17-august-1938)

‘I have said that the Divine does the Sadhana first for the world and then gives what is brought down to others. There can be no Sadhana without realisations and experiences. The Prayers are a record of Mother’s experiences.

4 January 1935′

(Ref. https://incarnateword.in/cwm/01/4-january-1935)

(Follow-up Question:)

In some of the Mother’s Prayers which are addressed to “divin Maître” I find the words: “avec notre divine Mère”. How can the Mother and “divin Maître” have a “divine Mère”? It is as if the Mother was not the “divine Mère” and there was some other Mother and the “divin Maître” was not the Transcendent and had also a “divine Mère”! Or is it that all these are addressed to something impersonal?

The Prayers are mostly written in an identification with the earth-consciousness. It is Mother in the lower nature addressing the Mother in the higher nature, the Mother herself carrying on the Sadhana of the earth-consciousness for the transformation, praying to herself above from whom the forces of transformation come. This continues till the identification of the earth-consciousness and the higher consciousness is effected. The word “notre” is general, I believe, referring to all born into the earth-consciousness—it does not mean the Mother of the “Divin Maître” and myself. It is the Divine who is always referred to as Divin Maître and Seigneur. There is the Mother who is carrying on the Sadhana and the Divine Mother, both being one but in different poises, and both turn to the Seigneur or Divine Master. This kind of prayer from the Divine to the Divine you will find also in the Ramayana and the Mahabharata.’

Though these letters are written in the context of the Mother’s Prayers, the context is the same, that is to say why should the Divine, the Avatar need to do Sadhana? Sri Krishna, for example, took initiation from Ghora Rishi. The reason is threefold 

First, the Divine who is evidently free takes birth in the limited field of human nature. It is somewhat like a king entering a dense forest in his kingdom and is attacked by the robbers. He has to conquer them, not so much for himself but to secure the field for his people. So too, the Divine, though free in His eternal being enters the dark fields of human nature to conquer them to secure it for others and, importantly also to show the way to us, bound creatures, to discover our freedom. The Mother’s Sadhana was not to find Her freedom but to help others find the way and show them to others that this can be done and the way to do it. 

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this…

Related Posts

I grew up thinking of homosexuality as a perversion and still it feels as such to me. However, I recently discovered that it was normalized in ancient Greece which came as a big shock for me. What are your thoughts on homosexuality and whether it is essentially the same as sex between a man and a woman?

Homosexuality (and its other aspect Lesbianism) have been known and accepted in ancient Greek as well as Hindu Society. It was considered a taboo, rather sinful mainly in the Islamic and Christian world. However these taboos didn’t prevent it from being secretly indulged. The only thing that this secret indulgence created was the …

Read More >

I am deeply inspired by the teachings of Sri Aurobindo and The Mother, as well as by your discourses. Today, I am reaching out to share an inner mental conflict that has been troubling me for a long time. Please guide me. 🕊️💬 […]

I understand your inner dilemma. But often it is better to tell the person that he is being hurtful rather than keep the anguish inside. Expressing yourself honestly, firmly, though not rudely or in anger, is the little inner change that is needed. It will help you and might…

Read More >