AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

My question is related to the debate on Environment vs Development. Nowadays, in Chhattisgarh, this debate is very much highlighted in the News because dense Hasdeo Arand Forests of the State are being cut down for Coal Mining, threatening the rich Biodiversity of the State, the displacement of the local tribes, and disturbing the Natural Elephant Corridor. Many media reports and people are saying that Adaniโ€™s Greed for Coal is eating up the Hasdeo Forest. […] ๐ŸŒณ๐Ÿญ๐ŸŒณ

The same issue is coming up in Bastar, where people are saying that the main intention of the Government to root out Naxalism in Bastar is not Development but to clear the path of leasing Iron Ore Mines to private Industrialists like Arcelor Mittal and Adani without caring for the rich Biodiversity of the region and local tribals. Kindly throw some light on this issue. How to decide who is on the path of Real Development?

This is a narrative that, if taken to its logical conclusion, would mean no more roads, no more revamping of cities, no more highways, no more Dams, no more airports, industries, because all of these require some kind of sacrifice of the environment. In fact, the very act of living and breathing requires the destruction of microbes. The predator and the prey, the non-vegetarian, the man using a fridge and a car or scooter, are all damaging the environment. Wars should not be fought in that case, and India must withdraw its troops from Ladakh and Siachen following the environmental issues it involves.

So you see the issue should be seen in the larger context and its long-term implications.ย 

It would also imply letting the sandalwood smugglers and ivory poachers, who actually kill elephants (not just destroy corridors), and the Naxals – who are all non-vegetarians and kill humans, reversing the clock of time to the primitive era, should all be left undisturbed because they alone have the right to live.

As to Adani and the mining and industries, in that case, all mines (why only Bastar) should be stopped, and we should go back to the old form of energy by burning kerosene and cutting wood (which is what the Naxals commonly do). In simple words, go back to the Socialistic-Communist model with Karl Marx and Lenin as our guru, Mao as the ideal to be followed, China, Cuba, and North Korea as our best friends. We should, in fact, buy nothing from any Capitalist country, whether the US or Europe. The whole silly, stupid argument is as plain as a pikestaff. Thank God the present government is ensuring that the Red Corridor turns green or brown or whatever else, regardless of these brainless idiots who do activism only to please their Deep State partners. Their logic is too shallow, too lop-sided, too rigidly narrow to be taken seriously. If left to them, they would let the poor remain poor while pulling down the financial and military growth of the nation until it loses its independence, not to a capitalist nation as earlier, but to the communist China, which would be much worse.ย 

No doubt environment should be respected, but not at the expense of national security and genuine development. Blind activism is too one-sided and too extreme to be true. Reason, true reason, should give us a balanced picture, weighing all the pros and cons and not stifle the legitimate means for creating wealth and developing a nation. Let them do their activism in China, which is building roads along the Himalayan borders, since environmental concerns are not limited to geographical boundaries. Let them lead by example by walking barefoot in the hills, refusing cars built by capitalists, and refusing to travel by Air since Airports are maintained by Adani!

Affectionately,

Alok Da 

Share thisโ€ฆ

Related Posts

I thought I had changed my past impure self a little bit; I thought I had become a little better human… but again, something happened and I feel I failed more miserably than before…. I have not changed at all…. I think I am worse… It is heartbreaking to know that I am just the same person as before…. ๐ŸŒฑ๐ŸŒ…๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป

The fact that you want to change is itself a sign that you have changed! This is how the change takes place. In the beginning we act almost unconsciously without even feeling the need for change. True progress begins when we become aware that we need to change. Otherwise almost everyone is busy finding faults with others which is such a waste of energy and effort. Good or bad we cannot change others. The only person we need to change is …

Read More >

I have a question like how to do actual self-giving? Even if we say we are completely surrendered to The Mother, there are still points and situations that show, something in us is still there, holding us back. ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป[…]

Self giving to the Divine is more than selflessness. Selflessness loosens the knot of the ego but still we may not act according to the Divine Will. Bhishma was quite selfless renouncing the throne and serving as a shield to the throne of Hastinapur defending the king regardless of who he was. But he was acting in opposition to the Divine Will. Self giving means to live for the Divine, to make the Divine Service the very motive of all our actions. It means to direct our thoughts to the Divine, to think of the Divine instead of the thousand useless things. With …

Read More >

Could you help me understand the following pad from Tulsidas’s Vinay Patrika? I am not entirely sure what he is really talking about. I think he is distinguishing between ordinary life and spiritual life, and it seems related to my previous question.

Here, Tulsidas ji is speaking about how true bhakti is not easy to practice. Many speak about it but very few can practice it.

He then goes on to give two examples to show that not all can do everything. One should have the right temperament for it. Thus, a fish can easily swim through a river and cross it…

Read More >