AT THE FEET OF THE MOTHER
Ask Alok da

She has told us that “Have faith. There is no disease which cannot be cured by the Divine Grace.” – and Sri Aurobindo has clearly written in Savitri that “All can be done if the God-touch is there.” If both our Sweet Mother and Sri Aurobindo have told us above Messages for us, then is there any doubt that Divine Grace will not cure the disease of my daughter when both my daughter and I want the Divine Grace to act and cure the disease?đŸ€•

There are several other things that they have said, and one has to take their entire writings on a subject to apply the thing correctly. It is not a question of doubt, – one should never doubt the Grace; it is about trying to compel the Grace by the force of one’s wish and desire. It is about understanding how the Grace acts. People do fall sick even in the Ashram, even among the closest disciples whose faith is unquestionable. And these people gave their lives to Sri Aurobindo and the Mother. What I am simply saying is that faith without surrender, without the willingness to accept the Divine Will, whatever it be,  for without this acceptance and surrender, faith is simply a bargain that depends upon the result and outcome. 

Secondly, we must understand that each soul brings its own destiny. Our prayers help, but the person for whom we pray has her own destiny. It is not a simple rule equally applicable to all under all circumstances.  Here is what Sri Aurobindo himself writes about prayers, which gives us the fuller picture. 

‘As for prayer, no hard and fast rule can be laid down. Some prayers are answered; all are not. You may ask, why should not then all prayers be answered? But why should they be? It is not a machinery: put a prayer in the slot and get your asking. Besides, considering all the contradictory things mankind is praying for at the same moment, God would be in a rather awkward hole if he had to grant all of them; it wouldn’t do.


If one lives in the world, one can offer such prayers [for help in resolving worldly problems]; but one must not expect that the Divine shall fulfil all those prayers or think that he is bound to do so. When one is a sadhak, the prayer should be for the inner things belonging to the sadhana and for outer things only so far as they are necessary for that and for the divine work.


What you say about prayer is correct. That [impersonal prayer] is the highest kind of prayer, but the other kind also (i.e. the more personal) is permissible and even desirable. All prayer rightly offered brings us closer to the Divine and establishes a right relation with Him.


As for the prayers, the fact of praying and the attitude it brings, especially unselfish prayer for others, itself opens you to the higher Power, even if there is no corresponding result in the person prayed for. Nothing can be positively said about that, for the result must necessarily depend on the persons, whether they are open or receptive or something in them can respond to any Force the prayer brings down.


Prayers should be full of confidence and without sorrow or lamenting.’

So while I fully sympathise with your situation and even join your prayers, yet all that I am suggesting is to add full faith and surrender. It implies an intuitive knowledge that while we pray yet ultimately the Divine knows what is best, and if He chooses to take us through a difficult time rather than fulfilling our wish, then well, He knows best. To pray with faith but completely surrender to His Will, whatever It may be, is always the best thing to do.

Affectionately,

Alok Da

Share this


Related Posts

I remember once reading in Sri Aurobindo’s commentary on the Isha Upanishad that one cannot become a Brahmin without first becoming a Kshatriya. I believe that I never had the Kshatriya element developed sufficiently within me, and it has always been a source of embarrassment and insecurity for me as a man. đŸ’ȘđŸ™đŸ»đŸȘ·[…]

He said both are needed. But these are things ingrained within us. Brahmin and Kshatriya are not  soul states, inner innate temperaments and not so much of outer actions. Nevertheless everything can be developed by practice. By taking the challenges of life, through vigorous physical exercises, by praying for strength, by reading …

Read More >

Bhaiya, Rishi Panchami fast is coming up, and I read the story behind it. Honestly, I found it quite absurd. The story talks about a woman unknowingly breaking certain rules during menstruation, cooking food that her husband eats, and then both of them facing severe karmic consequences in their next life. đŸȘ·đŸ™đŸ» […]

Yes, all these things have been added much later and have no authority in the main  Scriptures. It is a story added in some of the Puranas, mainly I suppose to enforce rules of hygiene for women during the menstrual period. This was one of the ways to instil certain hygiene practices through fear. It has no meaning now. Most of the fasts …

Read More >

How should we understand deities like Subrahmanyeshwara (Skanda/Murugan) and Vinayaka (Ganesha)? Are they individual divine beings, cosmic powers of the One Divine, or symbols of different aspects of consciousness? How should an aspirant in Sri Aurobindo’s Yoga relate to them in practice? đŸ™đŸ»âœš

The four original gods, Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh and, behind them all Krishna, are, in their origin, the four aspects of the One Divine, named in Indian spiritual thought as Sacchidananda. Sat (à€žà€€) is infinite existence from which Brahma ji emerges. Chit is Chit-tapas, Consciousness and Force from which Hari or Vishnu ji and Hara or Shiv ji …

Read More >